12.6 Safe nuclear waste disposal requires long-term security

low-level nuclear waste Radioactive waste, including any item that has become contaminated with small amounts of radioactive particles, including instruments, protective suits, or clothing from nuclear facilities.

high-level nuclear waste Radioactive waste, primarily nuclear fuel rods that have been depleted to the point that they can no longer contribute to the efficient production of electricity.

Nuclear power plants produce two types of radioactive waste that must be disposed of (see Chapter 9). Low-level nuclear waste includes any item that has become contaminated with small amounts of radioactive particles, including instruments, protective suits, or clothing from nuclear facilities. High-level nuclear waste is radioactive waste consisting primarily of nuclear fuel rods that have been depleted to the point that they can no longer contribute to efficient production of electricity. These fuel rods still contain uranium in addition to several other waste products of nuclear fission.

371

Over very long periods of time, radioactive waste will completely decay and become harmless. However, most radioactive isotopes take so long to decompose that the timeframe is essentially meaningless in terms of human timescales. Meanwhile, tiny particles and rays of energy are released during active decay, which can damage living tissue, including the DNA blueprint found within the nucleus of all organisms. Safety requires that nuclear wastes be disposed of properly so that they do not contaminate the environment and endanger humans and other organisms.

Technical Challenges

Developing a permanent repository for high-level nuclear waste requires addressing complex technical issues. To prevent radiation from escaping, nuclear waste must be securely stored within several feet of steel and concrete. In the short term, this is a relatively simple task. What makes storing nuclear waste so difficult is the great length of time needed before some unstable elements decay into harmless ones.

half-life The time needed for half of a given amount of a radioactive isotope to decay.

dry casks Steel and concrete structures used for temporary storage of nuclear waste.

Radioactive isotopes all decay, but at different rates. The time needed for half of a given amount of a radioactive isotope to decay is known as its half-life. While some nuclear fission waste products decay quickly, in a matter of hours or days, others require thousands of years. The half-life of plutonium-239, for example, is approximately 24,000 years. The durability of even the oldest known human structures, such as the 4,500-year-old pyramids at Giza, pales in comparison. Finding a suitable storage structure and location to accommodate these slow rates of radioactive decay presents a tremendous technical challenge. For the time being, most of the high-level nuclear waste in the United States is temporarily stored in concrete and steel towers called dry casks on the site of the reactors themselves, as the country searches for a long-term solution. These casks, while stable, cannot realistically be expected to last for the full length of time needed for the radioactive isotopes to decay to safe levels (Figure 12.16).

ONSITE MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE OF HIGH-LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE
image
FIGURE 12.16 Following a period of cooling in heavily reinforced and carefully monitored pools of water called spent fuel pools, high-level nuclear waste can be moved to onsite dry storage casks constructed of steel and concrete until a permanent repository is available.
(Guilaume Souvant/AFP/Getty Images) (Nuclear Regulatory Commission)

Social Resistance

One of the biggest challenges to creating a long-term solution for nuclear waste is that no community wants it in their backyard, due to fears of radioactive contamination. The United States has been successful in building and operating a repository for defense-related radioactive wastes at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in southern New Mexico. The proposed facility for storing high-level waste from civilian nuclear reactors is located at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, where nuclear wastes would be stored approximately 300 meters below ground and a similar distance above the level of groundwater (Figure 12.17). However, plans for the facility were halted in 2009, a year before it was to begin storing waste (see Chapter 9). The main reason for the cancellation was political opposition by local communities, who didn’t want nuclear waste transported through their towns.

PROPOSED NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY AT YUCCA MOUNTAIN, NEVADA
image
FIGURE 12.17 After investments of billions of dollars in geologic and engineering studies, construction, and development of detailed handling procedures for high-level nuclear waste, plans for the Yucca Mountain Repository were abandoned in 2009. Discussions concerning opening the site were reopened in the U.S. Congress in 2015, which added uncertainty to the proposed repository. (From U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission)

There were also questions concerning the suitability of the Yucca Mountain geology. Fractures in the geologic formation could provide an avenue for radioactive materials to contaminate groundwater below the storage facility. This would be particularly likely if the regional climate became wetter, which is possible during the million-year time frame that the facility is supposed to remain secure. Despite these concerns, in 2015, the U.S. Congress renewed efforts to open the Yucca Mountain repository, but whether the proposal will be approved remains uncertain. Meanwhile, the country remains without a site for disposing of high-level nuclear waste.

372

image

What roles should science, economics, and politics play in choosing a repository for high-level nuclear waste?

Think About It

  1. Explain what physical properties of nuclear waste preclude its disposal using conventional means.

  2. With the many hazardous wastes to which we may be exposed, why does nuclear waste appear to generate an especially high level of concern among the public?

12.3–12.6 Issues: Summary

Around the world, the amount of municipal solid waste generated is increasing with urban population growth and economic development. Food waste and other biodegradable waste take up valuable landfill space and represent an unnecessary and avoidable problem. Non-biodegradable waste also creates significant environmental problems. For example, plastics accumulate in natural ecosystems, such as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, where they threaten sea life.

Hazardous waste represents a great threat to the environment—contaminating land and water the world over. This type of contamination produced brownfields, abandoned industrial sites contaminated with hazardous waste that are unusable without remediation. The increase in the use of electronic devices has created a new source of waste—e-waste. Finally, radioactive waste poses unique challenges in that it must be sequestered in structures sufficient to shield the environment from harmful radiation. Nuclear waste remains in temporary storage at nuclear power plant sites across the United States and around the world.