7.2 Agriculture, forestry, and grazing systems are built on the natural biomes

terrestrial harvest systems

Ways of extracting production from ecosystems, ranging from hunting and gathering in unmanaged natural ecosystems to nomadic herding and small-scale subsistence farming to industrialized agriculture.

Humans establish their terrestrial harvest systems, such as forestry, ranching, and farming, within the boundaries of natural biomes (Figure 7.4). That means the same factors that influence primary production in nature—namely, climate, nutrients, and biodiversity—will also play a role in these systems. With careful stewardship, all the biomes can sustain production of resources useful to humans.

SYSTEMS THAT HUMANS HAVE DESIGNED FOR HARVESTING LAND-BASED RESOURCES ARE BUILT ON EARTH’S TERRESTRIAL BIOMES
image
FIGURE 7.4 People have found ways to acquire the resources needed to maintain themselves in all of Earth’s terrestrial biomes, each presenting a unique set of opportunities and challenges.
(Frontpage/Shutterstock) (USDA photo by Scott Bauer) (USDA-ARS) (USDA-ARS/Brian Prechtel) (Danita Delimont/Getty Images) (Kara Jade Quan-Montgomery/Shutterstock) (Alberto Giuliani/LUZphoto/Redux) Maria Stenzel/Getty Images)

Farming

The temperate forest biomes, with their moderate climates and fertile soils, can generally support intensive agriculture. This is particularly true for temperate deciduous forests, which have been cleared of oaks, maples, and other trees to make way for farms. For example, the highly productive rice farming of China and Japan is concentrated in the temperate forest biome. Some of the most fertile soils occur in temperate grasslands, which is why the prairie regions of North America and Eurasia have been centers of wheat and maize farming. Faming in prairie and Mediterranean regions often requires irrigation, which creates a challenge to sustainability (see Figure 6.13, page 167).

194

Ranching

ranching The practice of raising domesticated livestock for meat, leather, wool, and other products.

image

Why have the indigenous herding cultures of both tundra and deserts been largely nomadic?

Large grazing and browsing animals, such as elk, kangaroo, and musk ox, naturally exist on every continent, suggesting that ranching, the practice of raising domesticated livestock for meat, leather, wool, and other products is possible almost everywhere. Historically, migratory herding people inhabited the tundra, desert, and semi-desert biomes because those biomes have the lowest levels of primary production and are unsuitable for farming. The practice of irrigation has greatly increased the productivity potential of arid lands, allowing ranchers to settle in one place; however, it is not without environmental cost and controversy. Temperate grasslands, especially those receiving greater amounts of precipitation, are more fertile than deserts and, in their native state, may provide some of the most productive grazing habitats for livestock.

Forestry

forestry The management of forests and woodlands for the harvest of timber or fuelwood.

Tropical biomes generally sustain high levels of primary production (see Figure 7.1) and are home to valuable hardwoods such as mahogany and rosewood. However, because many tropical forests grow on old, highly oxidized soils from which abundant rains have washed most plant nutrients, reforestation can be a frustratingly slow process that makes sustainable harvesting more difficult (see Figure 7.6). In temperate coniferous forests, soils are generally less fertile than soils in deciduous forests because conifer needles are acidic. Taiga also has acidic soils and short growing seasons. Thus, these biomes are better suited to supporting forestry, the management of forests and woodlands for the harvest of timber or fuelwood, than agriculture.

Think About It

  1. The United States is large and encompasses several biomes with different potentials for agriculture and forestry. What problems might smaller countries face in meeting their food and timber needs?

  2. Are the biomes with the highest level of primary production always the best places for agriculture? Why or why not?

  3. When humans replace native vegetation with agricultural crops or a second growth forest, how might primary production differ from the original plant community?