Mutations are random with regard to an organism’s needs.

How do mutations arise? Consider the following example: If an antibiotic is added to a liquid culture of bacterial cells that are growing and dividing, most of the cells are killed, but a few survivors continue to grow and divide. These survivors are found to contain mutations that confer resistance to the antibiotic. This simple observation raises a profound question. Does this experiment reveal the presence of individual bacteria with mutations that had arisen spontaneously and were already present? Or do the antibiotic-resistant mutants arise in response to the presence of the antibiotic?

These alternative hypotheses have deep implications for all of biology because they suggest two very different ways in which mutations might arise. The first suggests that mutations occur without regard to the needs of an organism. According to this hypothesis, the presence of the antibiotic in the experiment with bacterial cells does not direct or induce antibiotic resistance in the cells, but instead allows the small number of preexisting antibiotic-resistant mutants to flourish. The second hypothesis suggests that there is some sort of feedback between the needs of an organism and the process of mutation, and the environment directs specific mutations that are beneficial to the organism.

To distinguish between these two hypotheses, Joshua and Esther Lederberg in 1952 carried out a now-famous experiment, described in Fig. 14.5. Bacterial cells were grown and formed colonies on agar plates in the absence of antibiotic. Then, using replica plating, a technique they invented, the Lederbergs transferred these colonies to new plates containing antibiotic. Only bacteria that were resistant to the antibiotic grew on the new plates. Because replica plating preserved the arrangement of the colonies, the Lederbergs were able to go back to the original plate and identify the colony that produced the antibiotic-resistant colony on the replica plate. From that original colony, they were then able to isolate a pure culture of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Replica plating allowed the Lederbergs to isolate a pure culture of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, even though the original bacteria never were exposed to antibiotic. This result supported the first hypothesis: Mutations occur randomly, and without regard to the needs of the organisms. The role of the environment is not to create specific mutations, but instead to select for them. The principle the Lederbergs demonstrated is true of all organisms so far examined.

Quick Check 1 If mutations occur at random with respect to an organism’s needs, how does a species become more adapted to its environment over time?

Quick Check 1 Answer

Mutant genes that are harmful or neutral are much less likely to persist in a population than ones that result in increased survival and reproduction because the latter mutations would lead to greater fitness.

296

HOW DO WE KNOW?

FIG. 14.5

Do mutations occur randomly, or are they directed by the environment?

BACKGROUND Researchers have long observed that beneficial mutations tend to persist in environments where they are useful—in the presence of antibiotic, bacterial populations become antibiotic resistant; in the presence of insecticides, insect populations become insecticide resistant.

HYPOTHESIS These observations lead to two hypotheses about how a mutation, such as one that confers antibiotic resistance on bacteria, might arise. The first suggests that mutations occur randomly in bacterial populations and over time become more common in the population in the presence of antibiotic (which destroys those bacteria without the mutation). In other words, they occur randomly with respect to the needs of an organism. The second hypothesis suggests that the environment, in this case the application of antibiotic, induces or directs antibiotic resistance.

METHOD To distinguish between these two hypotheses, Joshua and Esther Lederberg developed replica plating. In this technique, bacteria are grown on agar plates, where they form colonies (Fig. 14.5a). The cells in any one colony result from the division of a single original cell, and thus they constitute a group of cells that are genetically identical except for rare mutations that occur in the course of growth and division. Then a disk of sterilized velvet is pressed onto the plate. Cells from each colony stick to the velvet disk (in mirror image, but the relative positions of the colonies are preserved). The disk is then pressed onto the surface of a fresh plate, transferring to the new plate a few cells that originate from each colony on the first agar plate, in their initial positions.

image
FIG. 14.5

EXPERIMENT First, the Lederbergs grew bacterial colonies on medium without antibiotic, called a nonselective medium because all cells are able to grow and form colonies on it. Then, by replica plating, they transferred some cells from each colony to a plate containing antibiotic, so only antibiotic-resistant cells could multiply and form colonies. (Medium containing antibiotic is a selective medium because it “selects” for a particular attribute or element, in this case antibiotic-resistant cells.) Because replica plating preserves the arrangement of the colonies, the location of an antibiotic-resistant colony on the selective medium reveals the location of its parental colony on the nonselective plate (Fig. 14.5b). Finally, the Lederbergs were able to go back to the parental colony and demonstrate that it was a pure culture of antibiotic-resistant bacteria by plating cultures of this colony on selective medium (Fig. 14.5c).

CONCLUSION The Lederbergs’ replica-plating experiments demonstrated that antibiotic-resistant mutants can arise in the absence of antibiotic because at no time in the experiments did the cells on nonselective medium come into contact with the antibiotic. Only the successive generations of daughter cells carried over to selective medium by replica plating were exposed to the antibiotic. Nevertheless, by their procedure the Lederbergs were able to isolate pure colonies of antibiotic-resistant cells.

FOLLOW-UP WORK These results have been extended to other types of mutation and other organisms, suggesting that mutations are random and not directed by the environment.

SOURCE Lederberg, J., and E. M. Lederberg. 1952. “Replica Plating and Indirect Selection of Bacterial Mutants.” Journal of Bacteriology 63:399–406.