Table : TABLE 8.3 Comparing Theories of Intelligence
TheorySummaryStrengthsOther Considerations
Spearman’s general intelligence (g)A basic intelligence predicts our abilities in many different academic areas.Different abilities, such as verbal and spatial, do have some tendency to correlate.Human abilities are too varied to be presented as a single general intelligence factor.
Gardner’s multiple intelligencesOur abilities are best classified into eight or nine independent intelligences, which include a broad range of skills beyond traditional school smarts.Intelligence is more than just verbal and mathematical skills. Other equally important abilities help us adapt.Should all abilities be considered intelligences? Shouldn’t some be called less vital talents?
Sternberg’s triarchic theoryOur intelligence is best classified into three areas that predict real-world success: analytical, creative, and practical.These three areas cover the different aptitudes we call intelligence.These three areas may be less independent than Sternberg thought and may actually share an underlying g factor.
Emotional intelligenceSocial intelligence contributes to life success. Emotional intelligence is a key aspect, consisting of perceiving, understanding, managing, and using emotions.The four components that predict social success.Does this stretch the concept of intelligence too far?