Chapter 5. Busting Poachers with DNA Barcoding

Busting Poachers with DNA Barcoding

Biology Connections with Assessment
true
true
You must read each slide, and complete the question on the slide, before proceeding to the next one.
Like a product barcode, DNA barcoding is an emerging biotechnology that is helping scientists distinguish between closely-related species.

Read the article below. Then complete the comprehension questions that follow.

DNA check on aisle 7...

Imagine stumbling upon a mystery species in your back yard. Now, imagine if you could take that organism to your local grocery store and scan it like a can of peas. The species name would flash on the screen in a matter of seconds, and you would know for sure that the slimy thing you had found was a newt, not a salamander.

It might seem too sci-fi to be true, but researchers are perfecting a tool that achieves a similar goal. Called DNA barcoding, the emerging biotechnology can distinguish between closely related types of gorilla, crocodiles, and other animals.

Say you have two types of beetle that look nearly identical. Chances are, they share a common gene that contains a species-specific sequence. This sequence is called the DNA barcode region, and it exists in real life. Although unlike the barcodes found on grocery items, we can thank evolution for genetic barcodes.

It took years of trial and error to identify the genetic barcodes. Hundreds of researchers from around the world sequenced DNA from the animals they studied.

In 2003 a meeting was held at the Cold Spring Harbor Lab in Long Island, New York. The purpose: to compare notes on the genetic differences between species and select a region that had enough diversity to use as a DNA barcode. A gene called Cytochrome Oxidase I, or COX-1, eventually was selected.

Might you be carrying an endangered species on your arm?

Unlike many genes, COX-1 doesn’t vary much between individuals of the same species. Any two gorillas will have nearly identical DNA barcodes. But when comparing individuals from two different species—say a gorilla and an antelope, there is a clear difference.

Waiter, there’s an endangered species in my sushi

This has opened up a world of possibilities for those interested in identifying mystery meats. Imagine a customs official trying to evaluate a shipment of crocodile purses, or a police officer busting poachers in a nature preserve. When dealing with processed, treated leather or a slab of meat in a cooler, it’s hard to identify the species of origin. Based on sight and smell, it’s hard to know whether the meat came from an endangered animal like the Kouilou gorilla as opposed to an antelope, which is fair game.

Researchers who use barcoding technology can extract DNA from the sample and sequence the COX-1 gene. Because DNA is such a sturdy molecule, it can be extracted from processed meats and cured skins.

Like a product barcode, DNA barcoding is an emerging biotechnology that is helping scientists distinguish between closely-related species.

Picking the gene

DNA barcoding has shown that many restaurants inadvertently serve threatened and endangered red tuna. Next time you order sushi, you may want to avoid tuna altogether, or at least stick with albacore, which is a little better off (even though it's still over-fished).

Using a database called Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD), researchers next compare the barcode from the confiscated meat to snake, cow, and other COX-1 sequences. If the meat comes from a Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus), its barcode will differ no more than 2 percent from others of its kind. When compared to a piece of chicken—or even another crocodile species—the mystery meat sequence will be 4-10 percent different (or more!)

Researchers also have used this technology to test sushi. After analyzing 68 pieces of sushi from bars in New York City, George Amato, director of the American Museum of Natural History’s Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, made a surprising discovery. Most of the fish were mislabeled on the menu. One-third were identified as threatened Northern and Pacific bluefin tuna, while seven samples were southern bluefin, which experts say may soon go extinct.

Experts estimate that wildlife products have a global market of about $15 billion, and more than half of this trade involves illegal species protected by national laws and international policies. Since barcodes are admissible as DNA evidence, Amato is trying to help customs and law enforcement investigators integrate the new technology into their systems.

© 2015 W.H. Freeman and Company

5.1 Comprehension & Application Questions

Answer the following questions to demonstrate your understanding of the article.

Question 5.1

This gene, known by the acronym W5k/GdIKbs8xYCFQs0Z/Yubh1k4= , was chosen by researchers as the best candidate for DNA barcoding of mammals.

2
Correct. COX-1 was selected by researchers back in 2003 to serve as the genetic sequence used in DNA barcoding.
Incorrect. You have one try remaining. Hint: This mitochondrial gene was selected by researchers back in 2003 to serve as the genetic sequence used in DNA barcoding.
Incorrect. COX-1 was selected by researchers back in 2003 to serve as the genetic sequence used in DNA barcoding.

Question 5.2

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
2
Right! The COX-1 gene was useful because it varies significantly between disparate species but varies little (less than 2 percent) between members of the same species. An animal’s genetic make-up is a reflection of its evolutionary history. Members of the same species share a very close evolutionary history while individuals of different species have a more divergent evolutionary history. This sheds light on why the COX-1 gene varies significantly between members of different species.
Incorrect. You have one attempt remaining.
Sorry. Answer choice E is the correct answer. The COX-1 gene was selected because it varies significantly between disparate species but varies little (less than 2 percent) between members of the same species. An animal’s genetic make-up is a reflection of its evolutionary history. Members of the same species share a very close evolutionary history while individuals of different species have a more divergent evolutionary history. This sheds light on why the COX-1 gene varies significantly between members of different species.

Question 5.3

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
2
Correct. There is not a significant variation between members of the same species, but there is a significant variation in the COX-1 gene between different species. Good job!
Incorrect. You have one attempt remaining.
Sorry. The correct answer is B. There is not significant variation in the COX-1 gene between members of the same species, but there is a significant difference in the COX-1 gene between different species. Therefore, DNA barcoding using the COX-1 gene wouldn't be too helpful in making a genetic comparison between these two Kouilou gorillas.

Question 5.4

True or False: While DNA barcoding is effective for comparing genetic relatedness among living specimens, it is not very effective for testing products such as processed leather goods derived from animals. This is because DNA molecules, which are very fragile, are damaged or destroyed during the leather curing process.

IkLyhbbYRLnR0DDUHGa+YA==

Correct. As the article points out, DNA is a very sturdy molecule. DNA easily can be extracted from leather and cured animal skins, thereby allowing scientists to identify the species of origin.
Incorrect. As the article points out, DNA easily can be extracted from leather goods and cured animal skins, allowing scientists to get a clear genetic snapshot of the species of origin.

Question 5.5

When analyzing COX-1 sequences, scientists query this database, known by the acronym eyudGyR4df8Q2pWmXb4UQ+98BvA=.

2
Correct! The Barcode of Life Data Systems, or BOLD, database is a repository of sequenced DNA that scientists consult when analyzing COX-1 sequences from mammals.
Try again. You have one attempt remaining.
Incorrect. The Barcode of Life Data Systems, or BOLD, database is a repository of sequenced DNA that scientists consult when analyzing COX-1 sequences from mammals.

Question 5.6

Fill in the Blank:

Researchers tested szjqm6ZfNSRG+lYU from restaurants around New York City and found that most were selling species of fish that were very different from what was listed on their menus.

2
Correct. Researchers found that many restaurants were inadvertently serving threatened and endangered species of fish in their sushi, including red and southern blue fin tuna.
Try again. You have one attempt remaining. Hint: make sure you are spelling your entry correctly.
Incorrect. Researchers found that many restaurants were inadvertently serving threatened and endangered species of fish in their sushi, including red and southern blue fin tuna.

Question 5.7

UXEOsJWbJGLsQa3KkQLwXxI6V/wMZzvV1JZKwnupfy7ouVxr3cU+VNQmwpPwh2Y64mMLYTKsLEy53hCCog5zf7miPnD1RU5wWNlaJUECjuPcMznauw6qe+yG/p9qSgXwlMMz0YGuLCcZOEJqmDgL745vL3RiRIpBlIAx1uD9GcC05jhGIdKPGsfrCD0Q9KvTl6vVnxYvhrTqQ0dgKFSo46UYYZDDqei76veRSRfI+o3y4h7sl5pdg7Gol0daM9jGb3MOtQQKO5JJcETn3f+4dxqMJLnRnWHzYRl23qYIhh3hVaE2Tmr8Yu72/Tbo1zoETP5L3LKAy9wONm7wn1Y0H+7x8CNzxvfEleJBtvT0a4Z4WUN0Z1TQpcvv9U0YxDNGbGjLwiiVOBdiNNRA1d22rzY4PtAI3vB+jmEKPfs/eWRkKxbyQNPnhrsb7OIe5uihTG7W28ddJQU5AmwtHYE0sdltiWPXV5GbGcGELDeJV1MrdQIuin3e3NTgJzLGupXGA+SFRLS0Ov5Ra8lbH6H+9U7JCOEWMVNHk50jo6iCoULEIxikBrGxvmqm+Enq2vv4Qm2zADeJBDN3QZKNh0OukgukDtGnckOOBXlcIDxCsM9WLSVa2EtZKHFMfOChU4OvGQ+eSgAW22MxgDMapQj3gyzSBD2d8vLfR3KCqtuE+PmdhEiyJQNU4Tgvany9gueY0ddTWwYCUcikA3XCaE5U3VkgW6b6pK+J8l5wUWd6bKMvfPGW8FZrDz7Yf6lFS6d0ckhDgRKcNoZKIB5oEy4EExvP7kElbsXNs0GiUCwpuZYQFpGrUpcICFadM78hkB8MXHrvbv48vvTnQKTAu0aWWLxE3ikJIxFc8AJLNsSPBVGLu1keAX/6dw1ihHQZjoSQHgbCB9RJXnQCwg5EU2enTuy31KpoWdgXpL7TW508wSXVbvsXq0b0UX/P94DqwOBwb+JAO93zjA9Ghgsdh1rERrbk28RRsR0zuUadvAzsXcK6Y6Ys+GaMcgzy9ZkFnafERRlgd2BZnLPlnfUAYKnVSvk80GDUR1H9CyomUArH/k/9pTs1VlB2de+sEGew3ag0aFrm2olZ+0ZzJJ5Ik5MEs/4OejUUSN7yVwLOrUdvbWOeKlP32YYiXAkd+7EcAWfsHLn+USdKATP+OaLkukDXwxmeLjZw0cPSKpeuhr+zjfUgGCJrNVnzOQ8my4ECRNrdwmEImTvxn57zoyNF5sTo0S//uosXaeEWDAEL9PUGHt2fjh+yZpR0P2aSmCp4Ltxtsp3zqf3lNgxtoDubH+VbGZ1q+kUzQ54HrVKR4UNjKUH9MgiahUAv5vpMTfqDHx4teZTXY6XUFi6Wq+JKd971Jbf9m+An0FsVUD2pgcaWjArfN4dP1LjwwBX1c42aqK4iFTL0AE/19V5exQSNsL/mvxvJ16nhGtQ2MSC28ry5/IP1zeb5oczOT4hcCRyHTNYtt35MLIIkTI751nU892TDvA==
2
Correct! DNA barcoding has significantly improved conservationists’ ability to identify the use of endangered species in food, clothing, and more. Also, since DNA evidence is admissible in courts of law, DNA barcoding has the potential to help law enforcement officials prosecute those who poach endangered animals.
Try again. You have one attempt remaining.
Incorrect. The correct answer is D. DNA barcoding has significantly improved conservationists’ ability to identify the use of endangered species in food, clothing, and more. Also, since DNA evidence is admissible in courts of law, DNA barcoding has the potential to help law enforcement officials prosecute those who poach endangered animals.

Question 5.8

The article notes that global trade of wildlife products is a huge industry. What dollar amount represents the trade of protected/endangered species on the global market?

MBrSEjPJ8lwtIktWdVtqjTNgn0PjLL9oUwXWyIapF0mXJf1C+Ib1ZPTnnV0ecLcUUDQH36EgPqBPupVLJRv1+kxUcnbiprzs3PEWEOnvNEw=

2
Correct! The article notes that experts estimate that wildlife products have a total global market of about $15 billion. More than half of that trade involves endangered or protected species. Therefore, we can surmise that more than $7.5 billion of that total involves illegal species.
Try again. You have one attempt remaining. Hint: the article notes that experts estimate that wildlife products overall have a global market of $15 billion.
Incorrect. The article notes that experts estimate that wildlife products have a total global market of about $15 billion. More than half of that trade involves endangered or protected species. Therefore, we can surmise that more than $7.5 billion of that total involves illegal species.

Question 5.9

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
2
Testing multiple, random samples from each supplier would ensure better sample data for analysis. Likewise, obtaining the samples directly from the suppliers would prevent any cross-contamination that might occur when the meat is packaged at the supermarket.
Try again. You have one attempt remaining.
Incorrect. Testing multiple, random samples from each supplier would ensure better sample data for analysis. Likewise, obtaining the samples directly from the suppliers would prevent any cross-contamination that might occur when the meat is packaged at the supermarket.

Question 5.10

e3EZSoCdoT3ZNumI0UX+0G8OLu7t2+k+jkrHlQvlQT4XbBDg4YJiYUwr+XPKiwR8d/EYyobvsjVrmwppBPYXqYqu7+rZeRZjZh9T4MPbpdfQ//2tICLue6BbkeMo3fc1J4dG/kqADc0aI1wYS2zQ6c5zmHYp0UOT4+uXJlpp2v1F3j6s2RbthZ841kqDzHkWu18MdcdJU0HBi3Ja5obmCydAxl9uGBR0VKsGGPOsihVobvHbfwzXpgkjU38JVUlhT0DPHPdHxiyTX9yyf2ppDX1vq5VOyTPSjaxhoAROxCCvJQZnVgetF55ZwZzeTXJBAqLcWt7nfWtLtkylACf/eCtM9lJ6hqUzl5PqG4g6G4KOFz2OJfOVyOXTh6e+nHpbVsBD6VjB/QuW346OQ0EQUH/4qs8MyUouCjTCJ13ZARRU42JW20TlftxllTSzsF0FIwH9OsWNuWf89lP+9sfpRuoTWtHHy76IhcfJiAXFXYgGPbQ29RdAiPBPemqmiBUjcYY7tQ==
{"title":"Restaurant A","description":"No, try again. While it's possible that this sample also might have come from an endangered species, the barcode does not match the endangered tuna sample.","type":"incorrect","color":"#ffff00","code":"[{\"shape\":\"rect\",\"coords\":\"2,2,349,102\"}]"} {"title":"Restaurant C","description":"No, try again. While it's possible that this sample also might have come from an endangered species, the barcode does not match the endangered tuna sample.","type":"incorrect","color":"#ffff00","code":"[{\"shape\":\"rect\",\"coords\":\"2,242,349,342\"}]"} {"title":"Restaurant D","description":"No, try again. While it's possible that this sample also might have come from an endangered species, the barcode does not match the endangered tuna sample.","type":"incorrect","color":"#ffff00","code":"[{\"shape\":\"rect\",\"coords\":\"2,362,349,453\"}]"} {"title":"Restaurant B","description":"Right! Remember, the DNA barcode for two identical species will be identical or nearly identical (less than 2 percent variation). In this case, the sushi sample taken from Restaurant B exactly matches the DNA barcode for the endangered species of tuna.","type":"correct","color":"#ffff00","code":"[{\"shape\":\"poly\",\"coords\":\"2,121,44,199\"},{\"shape\":\"rect\",\"coords\":\"0,122,347,216\"}]"}

Activity results are being submitted...