Writing a Critical Response

Sometimes you will be asked to write a critical response—a paragraph or more in which you analyze ideas presented in an argument and express your reactions to them.

Before you can respond in writing to an argument, you need to be sure that you understand the writer’s position and that you have a sense of how supporting ideas are arranged—and why. You also need to consider how convincingly the writer conveys his or her position.

If you have read the argument carefully, highlighting and annotating it according to the guidelines outlined in this chapter, you should have a good idea what the writer wants to communicate to readers as well as how successfully the argument makes its point.

Before you begin to write a critical response to an argument, you should consider the questions in the checklist below.

Begin your critical response by identifying your source and its author; then, write a clear, concise summary of the writer’s position. Next, analyze the argument’s supporting points one by one, considering the strength of the evidence that is presented. Also consider whether the writer addresses all significant opposing arguments and whether those arguments are refuted convincingly. Quote, summarize, and paraphrase the writer’s key points as you go along, being careful to quote accurately and not to misrepresent the writer’s ideas or distort them by quoting out of context. (For information on summarizing, paraphrasing, quoting, and synthesizing sources, see Chapter 9.) As you write, identify arguments you find unconvincing, poorly supported, or irrelevant. At the end of your critical response, sum up your assessment of the argument in a strong concluding statement.

78

CHECKLIST

Questions for Critical Reading

  • What is the writer’s general subject?

  • What purpose does the writer have for presenting this argument?

  • What is the writer’s position?

  • Does the writer support ideas mainly with facts or with opinion?

  • What evidence does the writer present to support this position?

  • Is the evidence convincing? Is there enough evidence?

  • Does the writer present opposing ideas and refute them effectively?

  • What kind of audience does the writer seem to be addressing?

  • Does the writer see the audience as hostile, friendly, or neutral?

  • Does the writer establish himself or herself as well informed? As a fair and reasonable person?

  • Does the writer seem to exhibit bias? If so, how does this bias affect the argument?