Read the following passage and the information about its source. Then decide whether each student sample is plagiarized or uses the source correctly. If the student’s sample is plagiarized, click on Plagiarized; if the sample is acceptable, click on OK.
Click Submit after each question to see feedback and to record your answer. After you have finished every question, your answers will be submitted to your instructor’s gradebook. You may review your answers by returning to the exercise at any time. (An exercise reports to the gradebook only if your instructor has assigned it.)
ORIGINAL SOURCE
The dominant model of biological conservation everywhere is the national park: human exclusion from reserves designed for other species. The plausibility of this model arises from the fact that many extinctions are known to have been caused by human activities such as hunting, deforestation, and industrial pollution. During the last fifteen years, additional support has come from a new and highly fashionable science, conservation biology, which emerged in the United States in the 1980s. Devoted to the conservation of all biological diversity, rather than to the conservation and effective use of any specific resource, it is easily distinguishable from scientific forestry, fisheries biology, and so on, which nonetheless have some claim to be its intellectual antecedents.
From Sarkar, S. (2001). Restoring wilderness or reclaiming forests? In D. Rothenberg & M. Ulvaeus (Eds.), The world and the wild (pp. 37-55). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
[The source passage is from pages 37-38; only the last word appears on page 38.]