Charts and guidelines (pop-up windows)

Checklist for constructing an argument

Checklist for constructing an argument

  • Have
    A-supp-23
    you examined your issue’s social and intellectual context?
  • Have you developed a strong, arguable thesis? Have you answered the “So what?” question to show readers why your thesis needs to be argued?
  • Have you backed up your thesis with persuasive lines of reasoning?
  • Have you supported your claims with specific, sufficient, and relevant evidence?
  • Are your appeals—ethical, logical, and emotional—appropriate and balanced for your audience and issue?
  • Have you built common ground with your readers?
  • Have you anticipated and addressed counterarguments?

Academic English: Giving voice to an argument

ACADEMIC ENGLISH: Giving voice to an argument

A-supp-21

Some cultures value writers who argue with force and express their superiority. Other cultures value writers who argue subtly or indirectly, often with an apology. Academic audiences in the United States will expect your writing to be assertive and confident—neither aggressive nor passive. Create an assertive tone by acknowledging different opinions and supporting your view with specific evidence.

TOO AGGRESSIVE

Of course prayer should be discouraged in public schools. Only foolish people think that organized prayer is good for everyone.

Of course only registered organ donors should be eligible for organ transplants. It’s selfish and shortsighted to think otherwise.

TOO PASSIVE

I might be wrong, but I think that organized prayer should be discouraged in public schools.

I might be wrong, but I think that maybe people should have to register as organ donors if they want to be considered for a transplant.

ASSERTIVE TONE

Organized prayer should be discouraged in public schools because it violates the religious freedom guaranteed by the First Amendment.

If only registered organ donors were eligible for transplants, more people would register as donors.

If you are uncertain about the tone of your work, ask for help at your school’s writing center.

Evidence typically used in various disciplines

Evidence typically used in various disciplines

Humanities: Literature, art, film, music, philosophy

Humanities: History

Social sciences: Psychology, sociology, political science, anthropology

Sciences: Biology, chemistry, physics

Academic English: Statistical argument

ACADEMIC ENGLISH: Statistical argument

If you use evidence from research studies to support your arguments, be careful about how you use the findings from the studies. Data rarely prove anything; rather, the data suggest that something might be true (or at least not false) with a certain degree of confidence and with the expectation that sometimes the prediction will be wrong. Thus, claims about the results of studies are always expressed in such terms as “These data suggest . . .” or “It seems likely that . . .” or “The data showed a significant improvement. . . .”

Example of expert opinion

Example of expert opinion

A-supp-24

When student writer Onnalee L. Gibson wrote a reflective essay on a service learning project as a tutor in a high school, she wove into her reflections the words of other people. Sometimes she used them to support her points, and sometimes she disagreed with their ideas.

  • According to education researcher Jean Anyon (1981), “Students from higher social class backgrounds may be exposed to legal, medical, or managerial knowledge . . . while those of the working classes may be offered a more ‘practical’ curriculum” (p. 5). I do not see this gravitation toward social reproduction holding true for most students at Waverly High School.
  • In contrast to the idea that most people have nothing more than social reproduction to thank for their socioeconomic status (Bowles & Gintis, 1976), Eric seems to believe that hard work and a college education are keys to his success.
  • Too often students who do not need special education are coded for special ed—even when they have a learning issue that can be handled with a good teacher in a mainstream class (D. Carter, class lecture, April 6, 2006).

Her use of expert opinion shows that Gibson has read the educational literature, can connect the ideas of experts to her own experience, can offer counterevidence to their arguments, and can use notes from class and the field as support in her paper.

The voices of experts provide evidence to the reflection, putting other voices in conversation with her own. She engages in dialogue with others to give life to her writing.

Anticipating and countering opposing arguments

Anticipating and countering opposing arguments

A-supp-25

To anticipate a possible objection, consider the following questions:

  • Could a reasonable person draw a different conclusion from your facts or examples?
  • Might a reader question any of your assumptions?
  • Could a reader offer an alternative explanation of this issue?
  • Is there any evidence that might weaken your position?

To respond to a potential objection, consider these questions:

  • Can you concede the point to the opposition but challenge the point’s importance or usefulness?
  • Can you explain why readers should consider a new perspective or question a piece of evidence?
  • Should you explain how your position responds to contradictory evidence?
  • Can you suggest a different interpretation of the evidence?

When you write, use phrasing to signal to readers that you’re about to present an objection. Often the signal phrase can go in the lead sentence of a paragraph.

  • Critics of this view argue that. . ..
  • Some readers might point out that. . ..
  • Gray presents compelling challenges to. . ..
  • But isn’t it possible that . . . ?

Breaking a thesis into main claims and subclaims