Comparative Analysis The Fugitive Slave Law Contested Documents 12.2 and 12.3

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

The Fugitive Slave Law Contested

The Fugitive Slave Law was enacted on September 18, 1850, and soon after African Americans in Boston called a meeting to discuss their response (Document 12.2). Having heard rumors of arrests elsewhere, participants demanded the right to defend themselves. On February 15, 1851, local abolitionists, led by Lewis Hayden, rescued fugitive Shadrach Minkins from the Boston federal courthouse and spirited him to Canada. Three days later, President Millard Fillmore issued a proclamation demanding that citizens obey the law or be prosecuted (Document 12.3). Seven black men and two whites were arrested in Boston, but all were acquitted by juries.

Document 12.2

William C. Nell | Meeting of Colored Citizens of Boston, September 30, 1850

The Chairman [Lewis Hayden] announced, as a prominent feature in calling the present meeting—Congress having passed the infamous Fugitive Slave Bill—the adoption of ways and means for the protection of those in Boston liable to be seized by the prowling man-thief. He said that safety was to be obtained only by an united and persevering resistance of this ungodly, anti-republican law. . . .

The following resolutions were submitted, as a platform for vigilant action in the trial hour:—

Resolved, That the Fugitive Slave Bill, recently adopted by the United States Congress, puts in imminent jeopardy the lives and liberties of ourselves and our children; it deprives us of trial by jury, when seized by the infernal slave-catcher, and by high penalties forbids the assistance of those who would otherwise obey their heart-promptings in our behalf; in making it obligatory upon marshals to become bloodhounds in pursuit of human prey; leaving us no alternative . . . but to be prepared in the emergency for self-defense; therefore, assured that God has no attribute which can take sides with oppressors, we have counted the cost, and as we prefer liberty to life, we mutually pledge to defend ourselves and each other in resisting this God-defying and inhuman law, at any and every sacrifice, invoking Heaven’s defense of the right.

Resolved, That . . . eternal vigilance is the price of liberty, and that they who would be free, themselves must strike the first blow.

Source: “Meeting of the Colored Citizens of Boston,” Liberator, October 4, 1850.

Document 12.3

President Millard Fillmore | Proclamation 56 Calling on Citizens to Assist in the Recapture of a Fugitive Slave, February 18, 1851

Whereas information has been received that sundry lawless persons, principally persons of color, combined and confederated together for the purpose of opposing by force the execution of the laws of the United States, did, at Boston, in Massachusetts, on the 15th of this month, make a violent assault on the marshal or deputy marshals of the United States for the district of Massachusetts, in the court-house, and did overcome the said officers, and did by force rescue from their custody a person arrested as a fugitive slave, and then and there a prisoner lawfully holden by the said marshal or deputy marshals of the United States, and other scandalous outrages did commit in violation of law:

Now, therefore, to the end that the authority of the laws may be maintained and those concerned in violating them brought to immediate and condign punishment, I have issued this my proclamation, calling on all well-disposed citizens to rally to the support of the laws of their country, and requiring and commanding all officers, civil and military, and all other persons, civil or military, who shall be found within the vicinity of this outrage, to be aiding and assisting by all means in their power in quelling this and other such combinations and assisting the marshal and his deputies in recapturing the above-mentioned prisoner; and I do especially direct that prosecutions be commenced against all persons who shall have made themselves aiders or abettors in or to this flagitious offense.

Source: The Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 1789–1913 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1913), 988.

Interpret the Evidence

  1. How did African Americans in Boston justify their right to defend themselves in defiance of the Fugitive Slave Law and how would they have responded to Fillmore’s Proclamation 56?

  2. How does President Fillmore characterize the Boston abolitionists who sought to free fugitives like Shadrach Minkins, and what consequences does he propose for flouting the law?

Put It in Context

What do the conflicts over implementation of the Fugitive Slave Law in Boston suggest about the long-term impact of the law?