Guided Analysis Document 21.1 A. Mitchell Palmer, The Case against the Reds, 1920

GUIDED ANALYSIS

A. Mitchell Palmer | The Case against the Reds, 1920

Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer was a leading architect of the Red scare. In response to the strikes and riots throughout 1919 into early 1920, Palmer organized a series of raids against suspected Communists, anarchists, and other foreign radicals. More than six thousand people were arrested, most of whom were later released. In an article in Forum magazine, Palmer defended his actions and described his views on radicalism and its threat to American society.

Document 21.1

According to Palmer, what institutions did revolutionaries threaten?

Why does Palmer think communism is a threat?

Why doesn’t Palmer think there is any practical difference between the principles of radicals and their actions?

Like a prairie-fire, the blaze of revolution was sweeping over every American institution of law and order a year ago. It was eating its way into the homes of the American workman, its sharp tongues of revolutionary heat were licking the altars of the churches, leaping into the belfry of the school bell, crawling into the sacred corners of American homes, seeking to replace marriage vows with libertine laws, burning up the foundations of society.

Robbery, not war, is the ideal of communism. This has been demonstrated in Russia, Germany, and in America. As a foe, the anarchist is fearless of his own life, for his creed is a fanaticism that admits no respect of any other creed. Obviously it is the creed of any criminal mind, which reasons always from motives impossible to clean thought. Crime is the degenerate factor in society.

Upon these two basic certainties, first that the “Reds” were criminal aliens, and secondly that the American Government must prevent crime, it was decided that there could be no nice distinctions drawn between the theoretical ideals of the radicals and their actual violations of our national laws. An assassin may have brilliant intellectuality, he may be able to excuse his murder or robbery with fine oratory, but any theory which excuses crime is not wanted in America. This is no place for the criminal to flourish, nor will he do so, so long as the rights of common citizenship can be exerted to prevent him.

Source: A. Mitchell Palmer, “The Case against the Reds,” Forum, February 1920, 174–75, 185.

Put It in Context

How did the Red Scare shape the politics and culture of the 1920s?