Mating systems evolve to maximize fitness

We begin consideration of this enormous field of social behavior with mating behavior involving a single male and a single female. Because natural selection is always operating to maximize the reproductive success of both the male and the female of the species, an amazing array of mating systems has evolved.

MONOGAMY AND PROMISCUITY At the start of Chapter 7 you learned about the mating behavior of two species of voles. Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are monogamous, forming strong pair bonds that can last for life, and both parents participate in rearing the young. In contrast, montane voles (M. montanus) are promiscuous: males mate with many females, and the young are raised by the female alone. Behavioral physiologists have explained the proximate mechanisms behind these stark behavioral differences in terms of the release of neurohormones and the distribution of the receptors for those hormones in the brains of the two species. The ultimate question—and the one asked here—is why two such different mating systems evolved in two species that are so closely related.

We begin with the premise that there is an asymmetry in the contributions of male and female animals to their offspring at the time of fertilization. Females produce a limited number of eggs, and each egg is generously stocked with resources. Males produce an almost infinite number of sperm, which contain next to no resources. So the energetic and opportunity costs of reproduction are greater for the female than for the male. In mammals this asymmetry increases throughout gestation as the female bears most of the costs. By the time of birth or hatching, the female’s investment in the young is much greater than the male’s investment, and the main way for the female to maximize her fitness is to make sure her young are healthy and survive to pass on her genes.

The male has different options for maximizing his fitness. He can simply move on after inseminating the female and seek additional mates as a means of maximizing his reproductive success—as in the case of the montane vole. Or he can stay with the female he inseminated, protect her, and help care for their young—as in the case of the prairie vole. Which strategy maximizes male fitness in these species depends on a number of factors that are influenced by the environment, such as the likelihood that a female and her offspring will survive without a male’s help, and a male’s likelihood of finding another fertile female. Thus sociobiologists seek to quantify these factors in nature as a means of explaining observed differences in mating systems.

POLYGYNY Mating systems in which a male has more than one mate generally involve a male that manages to sequester a group of females from other males. The polygynous male increases his fitness by increasing the number of females in his group. As you saw in Key Concept 52.4, male elephant seals accomplish this by protecting an area of beach where females give birth. Male baboons do so by herding females. Male red-winged blackbirds may acquire more than one mate by defending high-quality nesting territories where females prefer to build their nests. Since sex ratios in all these species are close to 50:50, a large differential in male fitness is established, with some males having high reproductive success while many males have none. Thus selection favors males that are successful in competing with other males to obtain and protect access to many females. In general, bigger, stronger males are the winners, and sexual dimorphism in body size evolves. The elephant seal is an extreme example: males may weigh more than three times as much as females. When species with polygynous mating systems are compared, there is a strong correlation between the number of females a male controls and the degree of sexual dimorphism.

Why do females participate in these polygynous mating systems? Why doesn’t a female seek out a nice, kind, noncompetitive male? In some cases, such as the female elephant seal, she has no choice. If a female red-winged blackbird wants to nest in an optimal territory, she will have to share the attentions of the territory owner with other females. Even if the female has a choice of mates, she is likely to maximize her fitness by mating with a male that is strong and dominant enough to control a number of females. Why? If her mate is a dominant male, her male offspring are likely to have their father’s traits, become dominant males, and give her more grandchildren. Nonrandom mate choice by females based on male characteristics produces *sexual selection. An extreme result of sexual selection is the lek mating system (see Figure 52.9C), in which the only thing a male offers a female is the display of his dominance over other males.

1135

*connect the concepts Charles Darwin recognized the phenomenon of sexual selection leading to the evolution of traits that could compromise the health and survival of the individual. See Key Concept 21.2.

POLYANDRY Mating systems in which one female mates with multiple males are relatively rare, but polyandry is seen in some birds and a few mammal species in which paternal care for the young can have a large effect on fitness. An example of a polyandrous species is the golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia), a primate native to Brazil’s tropical rainforests (Figure 52.17). Tamarins are small—adults weigh less than 1 kilogram and face high predation pressure. Females usually give birth to twins, and newborns constitute a higher percentage of maternal weight than is typical of other primates. The young also grow more rapidly than other primates, so nursing costs are high. For all these reasons, young tamarins cared for by their mother alone are unlikely to survive.

image
Figure 52.17 Polyandry in a Small Primate The endangered golden lion tamarins of Brazil are small primates whose unique life history has given rise to polyandry in some groups, with males playing a major role in rearing the young.

What can a male tamarin do to help guarantee his reproductive success? Watching out for predators is one obvious contribution; gathering food for the female and her young is another. Like other primate parents, tamarins carry their young most of the time, but most other primates have single offspring. When tamarin mothers are carrying twins, they spend 92 percent of the time resting, compared with 58 percent of the time when they are not carrying young. Resting is not compatible with foraging and filling the mother’s high energy requirements. When a male is present, however, he carries the young about one-third of the time, so the mother has much more time for foraging and feeding.

If one male tamarin is helpful in protecting and raising young, then two should be even more helpful. Some females can attract a second mate by being sexually receptive to him. Neither male can be sure that any eventual offspring are his, so it is in the best interest of both to help in their rearing. Of the tamarin families observed in field studies, only 22 percent had one male and one female, whereas 61 percent had multiple males and one female.