Despite — or perhaps because of — this commercialization, rock survived. There were strong new currents countering commercialization and corporate control. Indeed the last decades of the twentieth century brought something of a rejuvenation. Three trends in particular can be pointed to:
The punk approach gave strong impetus to a kind of populist movement in rock, encouraging the formation of countless “garage bands” and the 1990s’ indie rock, distributed on small, independent labels. Some punk singers also pioneered an alienated, flat vocal delivery that contrasts both with the impassioned singing of earlier rock and with the streetwise cool of rap. In these features punk looked forward to the unpolished, moving, but somehow distant style of grunge rock, led by Kurt Cobain (until his death in 1994) and his band Nirvana.
The early 1990s marked rap’s moment of highest notoriety in the American mass media. One strain of rap — the violent, misogynist variety known as gangsta rap — figured centrally in the public debate, which was marked not only by justifiable distaste at the vision of these rappers but also by unmistakable racist undertones. However, the debate tended to miss two important points: First, while rap originated as a pointed expression of black urban concerns, it was marketed successfully to affluent whites, especially suburban teens. Second, the clamor against gangsta rap ignored the wider expressive vistas of rap as a whole. Already in 1980 rap was broad enough to embrace the hip-
And just as classic jazz appeared by the 1970s, so today we have classic rock; and the same question might again arise: Can creative freshness survive the prepackaged recycling of rock styles and gestures?
But perhaps, in the end, this is the wrong way to think of rock in the twenty-