Comparisons of the total chromosomal DNA per cell in various species first suggested that much of the DNA in certain organisms does not encode functional RNA or have any apparent regulatory function. For example, yeasts, fruit flies, chickens, and humans have successively more DNA in their haploid chromosome sets (12.5, 180, 1300, and 3300 Mb, respectively), in keeping with what we perceive to be the increasing complexity of these organisms. Yet the vertebrates with the greatest amount of DNA per cell are amphibians, which are surely less complex than humans in their structure and behavior. Even more surprising, the unicellular protozoan Amoeba dubia has 200 times more DNA per cell than humans. Many plant species also have considerably more DNA per cell than humans have; tulips, for example, have 10 times as much DNA per cell as humans. The DNA content per cell also varies considerably between closely related species. All insects or all amphibians would appear to be similarly complex, but the amount of haploid DNA in species within each of these phylogenetic classes varies by a factor of 100.
Sequencing and identification of exons in chromosomal DNA have provided direct evidence that the genomes of higher eukaryotes contain large amounts of noncoding DNA. For instance, only a small portion of the β-globin gene cluster of humans, which is about 80 kb long, encodes protein (see Figure 8-4a). In contrast, a typical 80-
The density of genes varies among regions of human chromosomal DNA, from “gene-
310
Different selective pressures may account, at least in part, for the remarkable difference in the amount of nonfunctional DNA in different organisms. For example, many microorganisms must compete with other species of microorganisms in the same environment for limited amounts of available nutrients, and metabolic economy is thus a critical characteristic for these organisms. Because synthesis of nonfunctional (i.e., noncoding) DNA requires time, nutrients, and energy, presumably there was selective pressure to lose nonfunctional DNA during the evolution of rapidly growing microorganisms such as the yeast S. cerevisiae. On the other hand, natural selection in vertebrates depends largely on their behavior. The energy invested in DNA synthesis is trivial compared with the metabolic energy required for the movement of muscles and the function of the nervous system; thus there may have been little selective pressure on vertebrates to eliminate nonfunctional DNA. Furthermore, the replication time of cells in most vertebrates and plants is much longer than in rapidly growing microorganisms, so there may have been little selective pressure to eliminate nonfunctional DNA in order to permit rapid cellular replication.