Global Change

The expression global change entered the world’s vocabulary when it became clear that emissions from fossil-fuel burning and other human activities were beginning to alter the chemistry of the atmosphere. People are becoming increasingly concerned about the anthropogenic changes that have been observed in every component of the climate system. This section will describe three of the most serious forms of anthropogenic global change:

The consequences of anthropogenic global change are motivating politicians to work together in ways they never have before as we all try to avoid the “tragedy of the commons”: the spoiling of our commonly held environmental resources by overexploitation. Neighboring nations are enacting mutually beneficial regulations to address regional environmental problems, and new multinational treaties are being formulated in attempts to manage anthropogenic effects on the global environment. Earth science provides the knowledge needed to make rational choices about global environmental management.

Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming

Since the beginning of the industrial era, fossil-fuel burning, deforestation, land-use changes, and other human activities have caused a significant rise in the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Figure 23.26 shows the atmospheric concentrations of three greenhouse gases—carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide—over the past 10,000 years. In all three cases, the concentrations remained relatively constant through most of the Holocene, but shot upward after the industrial revolution.

Figure 23.26: Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide over the last 10,000 years (large panels) and for 1750–2000 (inset panels). These measurements, compiled by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, were derived from ice cores and atmospheric samples. Shaded bands show the uncertainties in the measurements.

661

The global atmospheric concentration of methane has increased by 150 percent from its preindustrial value, and that of carbon dioxide has increased 48 percent. In both cases, the observed increases can be explained by human activities, predominantly agriculture and fossil-fuel use. Methane’s greenhouse effect is weaker than that of carbon dioxide, however, so even though its relative concentration has gone up more, its contribution to greenhouse warming is only about 30 percent as large. The postindustrial increase in nitrous oxide, primarily from agriculture, has been about 20 percent, contributing only a small fraction to greenhouse warming.

These increases in greenhouse gas concentrations have been accompanied by a rise in average temperatures at Earth’s surface (see Figure 15.21). The United Nations, recognizing the potential problems this warming trend poses, established an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 to assess the likelihood of anthropogenic climate change, its potential effects, and possible solutions to those problems (see Earth Issues 15.2). The IPCC provides a continuing forum for hundreds of scientists, economists, and policy experts to work together to understand these issues.

In its major assessment reports, the latest of which was released in 2013, the IPCC drew the following conclusions:

Predictions of Future Global Warming

The warming trend described in Chapter 15 has continued into the twenty-first century. The decade 2001–2010 was the warmest recorded since accurate temperature measurements began in 1880. The warmest year on record was 2010, followed by 2005. All ten of the warmest years have occurred since 1997.

How much hotter will the planet get, and how will the global warming affect local climates? Answering such questions requires predictions based on complex models of the Earth system. The predictions are uncertain because they depend strongly on how human population and the global economy will evolve, including how energy supplies will be exploited and what political decisions will be made (if any) to limit greenhouse gas emissions. The IPCC has forecast increases in atmospheric CO2 concentrations under a series of scenarios that sample the possibilities. Each scenario is characterized by a representative concentration pathway or RCP that corresponds to a net concentration of greenhouse gases in Earth’s atmosphere by the year 2100. Three of these scenarios are depicted in Figure 23.27:

Figure 23.27: Three scenarios or “representative concentration pathways” (RPCs) projected by the IPCC for carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide during the twenty-first century. Scenario A (red line) implies continuing high rates of fossil-fuel burning (RCP8.5); scenario B (green line) implies stabilization of emission rates in the latter part of the twenty-first century (RCP6); scenario C (blue line) implies a rapid conversion to nonfossil fuels (RCP2.6).

Here we can add that the scenarios for global population growth shown in Figure 23.1 were developed by the IPCC to be consistent with the three RCPs listed above. For example, scenario C corresponds to a declining world population in 2100.

The IPCC has used these scenarios to predict average global surface temperatures (Figure 23.28). Allowing for uncertainties in the Earth system models, it found that the possible range of global temperature increases during the twenty-first century could range from about 0.5°C to 5.5°C. The lower values can be achieved only through rapid reductions in fossil-fuel burning and conversion to clean and resource-efficient energy technologies. Under the less radical (but still optimistic) scenario B, the temperature rise by 2100 would likely exceed 2ºC, over twice the twentieth-century warming. In scenario A, the most pessimistic, the temperature increase would probably exceed 4ºC.

662

Figure 23.28: IPCC projections of average surface temperatures over the twenty-first century derived from scenarios A (red line, RCP8.5), B (green line, RCP6), and C (blue line, RPC2.6). Gray-shaded band gives the uncertainties in past measurements; color-shaded band shows the prediction uncertainties due to incomplete knowledge of the climate system.

Consequences of Climate Change

It seems clear that human emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further global warming and may result in major changes to the climate system. These changes have the potential to affect civilization in both positive and negative ways. Some regional climates may improve while others may deteriorate. The authors’ home city of Los Angeles, for example, is likely to become hotter and drier. Some potential effects of climate change are listed in Table 23.1.

System Potential Effects
Forests and other ecosystems Migration of vegetation; reduction in ecosystem ranges; altered ecosystem composition
Species diversity Loss of diversity; migration of species; invasion of new species
Coastal wetlands Inundation of wetlands; migration of wetland vegetation
Aquatic ecosystems Loss of habitat; migration to new habitats; invasion of new species
Coastal resources Inundation of coastal structures; increased risk of flooding
Water resources Changes in water supplies; changes in patterns of drought and flooding; changes in water quality
Agriculture Changes in crop yields; shifts in relative productivity among regions
Human health Shifts in ranges of infectious disease organisms; changes in patterns of heat-stress and cold-weather afflictions
Energy Increase in cooling demand; decrease in heating demand; changes in hydroelectric energy resources
Table 23.1: TABLE 23-1: Potential Effects of Climate Change on Ecosystems and Resources

Source: Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress.

Changes in Regional Weather Patterns

How will the enhanced greenhouse effect, along with other factors, such as deforestation, change temperatures across Earth’s surface? Figure 23.29 maps the regional temperature increases predicted by the three IPCC scenarios. The predicted geographic patterns of temperature change display some similarities to the observed pattern of late-twentieth-century warming in Figure 15.21. In particular, the warming is greater over land than over the oceans, and the temperate and polar regions of the Northern Hemisphere show the most warming. Thus, geographic patterns of climate change in the twenty-first century are likely to be similar to those observed over the past several decades.

Figure 23.29: Average surface temperatures predicted for 2080–2100 by the three IPCC scenarios of Figure 23.28, expressed as differences from average surface temperatures measured at the same locations during the baseline period 1986–2005.

The IPCC has documented a number of current trends in regional weather patterns that are likely to continue:

664

Changes in The Cryosphere

Nowhere are the effects of global warming more evident than in polar regions. The amount of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean is decreasing, and the downward trend seems to be accelerating. The sea ice cover in September 2012 was the lowest for that month since the keeping of satellite records began in 1978: 3.6 million square kilometers, down by a factor of two from the 1979 minimum of 7.2 million square kilometers (Figure 23.30). According to climate models, much of the Arctic Ocean will become ice-free within a few decades. The shrinkage of sea ice is already severely disrupting Arctic ecosystems (Figure 23.31).

Figure 23.30: Global warming is melting the Arctic ice cap. These images of the Arctic, derived from NASA satellite data, compare the minimum extent of the polar ice cap in September 1979 (top) with the minimum extent in 2012 (bottom). One near-term benefit to human society will be the opening of the Northwest Passage and other shorter sea routes between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (show on bottom panel as red lines).
Figure 23.31: Climate change is already disrupting Arctic ecosystems, adversely affecting the habitat of Arctic animals such as polar bears.

Temperatures at the top of the permafrost layer in the Arctic have risen by 3°C since the 1980s, and the melting of permafrost is destabilizing structures such as the Trans-Alaska oil pipeline (see Figure 21.20). The maximum area covered by seasonally frozen ground has decreased by about 7 percent in the Northern Hemisphere since 1900, with a decrease in spring of up to 15 percent. Valley glaciers at lower latitudes retreated during the twentieth-century warming (see Figure 21.9). Fieldwork has demonstrated that rates of glacial retreat and snow cover loss are increasing in both hemispheres. According to a study by the USGS, Glacier National Park in northern Montana will lose its large glaciers by 2030.

Sea Level Rise

As we saw in Chapter 21, the melting of sea ice does not affect sea level, but the melting of continental glaciers causes sea level to rise. Sea level also rises as the temperature of ocean water increases, increasing its overall volume by a tiny fraction (see Chapter 21, Practicing Geology). Sea level has risen more than 2 m since the industrial revolution, and it is currently rising at about 3 mm per year. Climate models based on the IPCC scenarios indicate that sea level could rise by as much as a meter during the twenty-first century (Figure 23.32), creating serious problems for low-lying countries such as Bangladesh (Figure 23.33). On the Eastern Seaboard and Gulf Coast of the United States, flooding during coastal storm surges, such as that witnessed in Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy (see Chapter 20), could become much worse.

Figure 23.32: Sea-level rise 1700–2100. The black line shows the observed value through 2010. The red curve is the IPCC prediction of future sea-level rise during the remainder of the twenty-first century according to scenario A; the blue curve is the prediction according to scenario C.
Figure 23.33: Aerial view of a coastal region of Bangladesh flooded by a storm surge in May 2009. This low-lying country would be subject to disastrous flooding if sea level rises due to global warming.

665

Species and Ecosystem Migration

As local and regional climates change, ecosystems will change with them. Many plant and animal species will have difficulty adjusting to rapid climate change or migrating to more suitable climates. Those that cannot cope with the rapid warming could become extinct. Global warming is already being blamed for a variety of adverse ecological effects, such as the disruption of Arctic ecosystems as sea ice and permafrost melt and the spread of tropical diseases like malaria as more of the world experiences a tropical climate.

The Potential for Catastrophic Changes to The Climate System

The current atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane far exceed anything seen in the last 650,000 years. Our climate system is therefore entering unknown territory. Some observers think that the credibility of climate change projections suffers from “the Chicken Little problem”: too many people are running around yelling “The sky is falling!” Yet most scientists think that those projections may be too conservative because they do not properly take into account some of the positive feedbacks within the climate system that could greatly enhance global change. Ocean acidification, mentioned earlier in this chapter, is a good example. Here are a few more:

666

Ocean Acidification

As we saw in Chapter 15, about 30 percent of the carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere by fossil-fuel combustion is being absorbed by the oceans (see Figure 15.19). Scientists are concerned that the resulting increase in seawater acidity (see Figure 15.15) could decrease the calcification processes underlying the growth of shellfish and the formation of the hard exterior skeletons of corals.

In January 2009, 155 marine scientists from 26 countries, convened under the auspices of the United Nations, issued the Monaco Declaration, which states, “We are deeply concerned by recent, rapid changes in ocean chemistry and their potential, within decades, to severely affect marine organisms.… Severe damages are imminent.” The scientists pointed specifically to observations of acidification-related decreases in shellfish weights and slowed growth of coral reefs.

Ocean acidification is likely to affect many types of marine organisms, not just those with calcium carbonate shells and skeletons. Anemones and jellyfish, for example, appear to be susceptible to even small changes in seawater acidity, and larger increases cause changes in seawater chemistry that can undermine the health of sea urchins and squid. The growing acidity of ocean surface waters is also likely to affect the concentrations of trace metals such as iron, an essential nutrient for the growth of many organisms.

As human activities continue to pump more CO2 into the atmosphere, the ocean will continue to acidify. Whether marine organisms can adapt to the changes in store remains to be seen, but the effects on human society could be substantial. In the short term, damage to coral reef ecosystems and the fisheries and recreation industries that depend on them could result in economic losses amounting to many billions of dollars per year. In the longer term, changes in the stability of coastal reefs may reduce the protection they offer to coasts, and there may also be direct and indirect effects on commercially important fish and shellfish species.

Ocean acidification is essentially irreversible during our lifetimes. Even if we were magically able to reduce the atmospheric concentration of CO2 to the level of 200 years ago, it would take tens of thousands of years for ocean chemistry to return to the conditions that existed at that time.

Loss of Biodiversity

In 2003, atmospheric chemist and Nobel laureate Paul Crutzen proposed the recognition of a new geologic epoch—the Anthropocene, or Age of Man—beginning about 1780, when James Watt’s coal-powered steam engine launched the industrial revolution. The global changes that mark the Holocene-Anthropocene boundary are just now getting under way, so a future scientist with a full record of the next few thousand years may place that boundary at a somewhat later date. Crutzen’s main point, however, is that global changes are proceeding so rapidly that such quibbles are likely to be minor. As with many previous geologic boundaries, the main marker will be a mass extinction.

667

Between 1850 and 1880, as much as 15 percent of the land surface was deforested, and rates of deforestation have continued to rise. According to the United Nations, over 150,000 km2 of tropical rain forests—about 1 percent of the total resource—are being converted each year to other land uses, mostly agricultural ones. In 1950, forests covered approximately 25 percent of Haiti (a Caribbean island country the size of Maryland); its forested area now stands at less than 2 percent (Figure 23.34). Other developing nations face similar problems.

Figure 23.34: The Caribbean island country of Haiti is now 98 percent deforested.

Given these rates of habitat loss, it is not surprising that the number of extant species—the most important measure of biodiversity—is declining. Biologists estimate that there are over 10 million different species alive on the planet today, although only 1.5 million have been officially classified. Extinction rates are difficult to quantify, but most knowledgeable scientists believe that up to one-fifth of all species will disappear during the next 30 years, and that as many as one-half may go extinct during the twenty-first century. One respected biologist, Peter Raven, has put the problem bluntly:

We are confronting an episode of species extinction greater than anything the world has experienced for the past 65 million years. Of all the global problems that confront us, this is the one that is moving the most rapidly and the one that will have the most serious consequences. And, unlike other global ecological problems, it is completely irreversible.

Some observers, such as sociobiologist E. O. Wilson, have gone so far as to call the current rapid worldwide decline in biodiversity the “Sixth Extinction,” placing it in the same rank as the “Big Five” mass extinctions of the Phanerozoic eon (see Figure 11.17). Others consider this extrapolation to be premature, however, because even the rapid losses in biodiversity we see today will not necessarily affect the fossil record as profoundly as, say, the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous period, or even the less severe mass extinction associated with global warming at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary.