After several months under the dome, the humans grew so tired they couldn’t work. Nobody knew why, but scientists on the outside suspected that it had something to do with nutrient cycles.

On Earth, nutrients cycle through both biotic and abiotic components of an ecosystem— organisms, air, land, and water. They are stored in abiotic or biotic parts of the environment called reservoirs, or sinks, and linger in each for various lengths of time, known as residence times. Organisms acquire nutrients from the reservoir, and those nutrients are then cycled through the food chain and eventually are returned to the reservoir.

150

For carbon, the atmosphere—where carbon is stored as CO₂ —is the most important reservoir. (Oceans and soil are also abiotic reservoirs for carbon. Oceans absorb CO₂ directly from the atmosphere, and soils accumulate it during decomposition.) Plants and other photosynthesizers use carbon molecules from atmospheric CO₂ to build sugar, and they release oxygen in the process. Because they “produce” sugar (an organic molecule) from inorganic atmospheric CO₂, they are called producers.

This sugar molecule represents stored chemical energy that the producer can use. A consumer, the organism that eats the plant (or that eats the organism that eats the plant), also uses the chemical energy of sugar. This energy is released to the cell via the process of cellular respiration. All organisms—producers and consumers—perform cellular respiration. (For more information on producers, consumers, and the food chain, see Chapter 10.) INFOGRAPHIC 8.7

From its initial incorporation into living tissue via photosynthesis, to its ultimate return to the atmosphere through respiration or through the burning of carbon-based fuels, carbon cycles in and out of various molecular forms and in and out of living things as it moves through the carbon cycle. INFOGRAPHIC 8.8

Even though a single carbon atom might be captured by photosynthesis and returned to the atmosphere via cellular respiration in a few weeks or years, decades can pass before changes in a Brazilian rain forest impact a farm in Iowa. Inside Biosphere 2, the same cycle took approximately 3 days, which meant that changes in one biome could be felt in another biome much more quickly than on Earth.

Still, Biosphere 2’s carbon cycle was not that different from Earth’s; carbon moved from living tissue to the atmosphere and back in the same predictable manner. Or at least it should have. As the biospherians’ energy waned, it became clear that something had gone terribly wrong.

It turned out that oxygen levels had fallen steadily—from 21% down to 14%. At such low concentrations, the biospherians were unable to convert the food they consumed into usable energy. “We were just dragging ourselves around the place,” Poynter says. “And we had sleep apnea at night. So we’d wake up gasping for air because our blood chemistry had changed.”

In just a few months, some 7 metric tons of oxygen—enough to keep six people breathing for 6 months—had gone missing. As scientists from Columbia University later discovered, soil microbes were gobbling up all that O₂ and converting it into CO₂ as they decomposed the organic matter in the soil.

The biospherians responded by filling all unused planting areas with morning glory vines, a pretty and fast-growing (but, as it turned out, invasive) species they hoped would maximize the amount of CO₂ converted back into O₂ by photosynthesis. But even with an abundance of plants and enough CO₂, photosynthesis was still limited by the availability of sunlight; even the morning glories couldn’t keep up with the soil microbes in their warm, well-watered, highly organic soil.

151

Biosphere 2 is not alone with regard to a disrupted carbon cycle. Human activity has greatly altered carbon amounts in Earth’s atmosphere. Many of our actions (like burning fossil fuels) increase the amount of carbon normally released into the atmosphere or degrade natural ecosystems so that less carbon is removed from the atmosphere (as in the case of deforestation). Just as with Biosphere 2, this extra atmospheric carbon causes problems such as global climate change, acidification of oceans, and alterations of communities worldwide.

Adding to the confusion, concrete used to build parts of Biosphere 2 was absorbing some of the CO₂ and converting it into calcium carbonate, trapping some of the carbon and oxygen in this unexpected sink.

Besides carbon, other chemicals essential for life, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, cycle through ecosystems. Nitrogen, the most abundant element in Earth’s atmosphere, is needed to make proteins and nucleic acids, but plants cannot utilize nitrogen in its atmospheric form (N₂). All plant life, and ultimately all animal life, too, depends on microbes (bacteria) to convert atmospheric nitrogen into usable forms as part of the nitrogen cycle.

152

In a process called nitrogen fixation, bacteria convert atmospheric nitrogen (N₂) into ammonia (NH₃), which plants subsequently take up through their roots; consumers take in nitrogen via their diet. A small amount of N₂ is fixed by lightning, producing nitrate (NO₃). In other steps of the nitrogen cycle (decomposition, nitrification, and denitrification), various types of bacteria feed on nitrogen compounds in organic matter or the soil, eventually returning it to the atmosphere as N₂. INFOGRAPHIC 8.9

In Biosphere 2, the nitrogen cycle was disrupted. Thanks to an overabundance of soil microbes, nitrous oxide (N₂O), or laughing gas, a normal by-product of denitrification, reached levels high enough to interfere with the metabolism of vitamin B12, which is essential to the brain and nervous system.

The phosphorous cycle was also disrupted in Biosphere 2. Unlike nitrogen and carbon, phosphorus—which is needed to make DNA and RNA—is found only in solid or liquid form on Earth, so the phosphorus cycle does not move through the atmosphere but passes from inorganic to organic form through a series of interactions with water and organisms. INFOGRAPHIC 8.10

153

In Biosphere 2 phosphorus got trapped in the water system, polluting aquatic habitats, because the underwater and terrestrial plants there were dying off too quickly to complete this cycle. Biospherians removed excess nutrients from their water supply by passing the water over algal mats that would absorb the phosphorus and could then be harvested, dried, and stored.

As food reserves dwindled, the eight biospherians split into two factions. One group felt that scientific research was the top priority and wanted to import food so that they would have enough energy to continue with their experiments. The other group felt that maintaining a truly closed system—one where no biomass was allowed to enter or leave—was the project’s most important goal; proving that humans could survive exclusively on what the dome provided would be essential to one day colonizing the Moon or Mars. To them, importing food would amount to a mission failure. “It was a heartbreaking split,” Poynter says. “Just 6 months into the mission, and two people on the other side of the divide had been my closest friends going in.” Eventually, Poynter snuck in food. That wasn’t the only breach. To solve the various nutrient cycle conundrums, the project’s engineers installed a CO₂ scrubber and pumped in 17,000 cubic meters (600,000 cubic feet or about 4 million gallons) of oxygen.

154

Biosphere officials hid these actions from all but a few key people. When one reporter finally broke the story, the public was outraged. Spectators of every ilk—seasoned scientists, skeptical reporters, and casual observers alike—became convinced that other data were also being fudged. “Secrets are like kryptonite to the scientific process,” says Griffin. “Once you find out something has been deliberately overhyped or downplayed, or just plain lied about, all the data from that research becomes suspect. And data that can’t be trusted has no scientific value.”

Three years after the first mission was completed, the editors of the respected journal Science deemed the entire project a failure. “Isolating small pieces of large biomes and juxtaposing them in an artificial enclosure changed their functioning and interactions, rather than creating a small working Earth as originally intended,” they wrote. For the $200 million dome to survive as a scientific enterprise, they concluded, it would need dramatic retooling.

Three years after the first mission was completed, the editors of the respected journal Science deemed the entire project a failure.

155