Review (Chicago)

Note

Chicago-74

36. David Denby, “Dead Reckoning,” review of Zero Dark Thirty, directed by Kathryn Bigelow, New Yorker, December 24/31, 2012, 130.

37. David Eggleton, review of Stalking Nabokov, by Brian Boyd, New Zealand Listener, December 13, 2012, http://www.listener.co.nz/culture/books/stalking-nabokov-by-brian-boyd-review/.

Bibliography

Denby, David. “Dead Reckoning.” Review of Zero Dark Thirty, directed by Kathryn Bigelow. New Yorker, December 24/31, 2012, 130-32.

Eggleton, David. Review of Stalking Nabokov, by Brian Boyd. New Zealand Listener, December 13, 2012. http://www.listener.co.nz/culture/books/stalking-nabokov-by-brian-boyd-review/.

Explain

  • Begin with the author of the review.
  • If the review has a title, provide it immediately following the author of the review, as in sample note 36 and the corresponding bibliography entry.
  • Give the title of the work reviewed and relevant information about the writer, director, or other principal person involved with the work reviewed.
  • End with publication information for the publication in which the review appears (journal, magazine, newspaper, and so on).

Note on breaking URLs and DOIs

  • If you must break a URL or a DOI at the end of a line, break it after a colon or a double slash or before any other mark of punctuation.
  • Chicago-75
    Do not add a hyphen.
  • Do not put a period at the end of the entry.

General guidelines for Chicago notes and bibliography

Directory to Chicago notes and bibliography entries

Related topics:

First and later (shortened) notes for a source