36.4 The Clinical Development of Drugs Proceeds Through Several Phases

In the United States, the FDA requires demonstration that drug candidates be effective and safe before they may be used in human beings on a large scale. This requirement is particularly true for drug candidates that are to be taken by people who are relatively healthy. More side effects are acceptable for drug candidates intended to treat significantly ill patients such as those with serious forms of cancer, where there are clear, unfavorable consequences for not having an effective treatment.

1052

Clinical trials are time consuming and expensive

Figure 36.27: Clinical-trial phases. Clinical trials proceed in phases examining safety and efficacy in increasingly large groups.

Clinical trials test the effectiveness and potential side effects of a candidate drug before it is approved by the FDA for general use. These trials proceed in at least three phases (Figure 36.27). In Phase I, a small number (typically from 10 to 100) of usually healthy volunteers take the drug for an initial study of safety. These volunteers are given a range of doses and are monitored for signs of toxicity. The efficacy of the drug candidate is not specifically evaluated.

In Phase II, the efficacy of the drug candidate is tested in a small number of persons who might benefit from the drug. Further data regarding the drug’s safety are obtained. Such trials are often controlled and double-blinded. In a controlled study, subjects are divided randomly into two groups. Subjects in the treatment group are given the treatment under investigation. Subjects in the control group are given either a placebo—that is, a treatment such as sugar pills known to not have intrinsic value—or the best standard treatment available, if withholding treatment altogether would be unethical. In a double-blinded study, neither the subjects nor the researchers know which subjects are in the treatment group and which are in the control group. A double-blinded study prevents bias in the course of the trial. When the trial has been completed, the assignments of the subjects into treatment and control groups are unsealed and the results for the two groups are compared. A variety of doses are often investigated in Phase II trials to determine which doses appear to be free of serious side effects and which doses appear to be effective.

The power of the placebo effect—that is, the tendency to perceive improvement in a subject who believes that he or she is receiving a potentially beneficial treatment—should not be underestimated. In a study of arthroscopic surgical treatment for knee pain, for example, subjects who were led to believe that they had received surgery through the use of videotapes and other means showed the same level of improvement, on average, as subjects who actually received the procedure.

In Phase III, similar studies are performed on a larger and more diverse population. This phase is intended to more firmly establish the efficacy of the drug candidate and to detect side effects that may develop in a small percentage of the subjects who receive treatment. Thousands of subjects may participate in a typical Phase III study.

Clinical trials can be extremely costly. Hundreds or thousands of patients must be recruited and monitored for the duration of the trial. Many physicians, nurses, clinical pharmacologists, statisticians, and others participate in the design and execution of the trial. Costs can run from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars. Extensive records must be kept, including documentation of any adverse reactions. These data are compiled and submitted to the FDA. The full cost of developing a drug is currently estimated to be more than $800 million.

Even after a drug has been approved and is in use, difficulties can arise. Clinical trials run after a drug has entered the market, referred to as Phase IV studies, are designed to identify low-frequency side effects that may only emerge after widespread or long-term use. As mentioned earlier, rofecoxib (Vioxx), for example, was withdrawn from the market after significant cardiac side effects were detected in Phase IV clinical trials. Such events highlight the necessity for users of any drug to balance beneficial effects against potential risks.

1053

The evolution of drug resistance can limit the utility of drugs for infectious agents and cancer

Many drugs are used for long periods of time without any loss of effectiveness. However, in some cases, particularly for the treatment of cancer or infectious diseases, drug treatments that were initially effective become less so. In other words, the disease becomes resistant to the drug therapy. Why does this resistance develop? Infectious diseases and cancer have a common feature—namely, that an affected person contains many cells (or viruses) that can mutate and reproduce. These conditions are necessary for evolution to take place. Thus, an individual microorganism or cancer cell may, by chance, have a genetic variation that makes it more suitable for growth and reproduction in the presence of the drug. These microorganisms or cells are more fit than others in their population, and they will tend to take over the population. As the selective pressure due to the drug is continually applied, the population of microorganisms or cancer cells will tend to become more and more resistant to the presence of the drug. Note that resistance can develop by a number of mechanisms.

The HIV protease inhibitors discussed earlier provide an important example of the evolution of drug resistance. Retroviruses are very well suited to this sort of evolution because reverse transcriptase carries out replication without a proofreading mechanism. In a genome of approximately 9750 bases, each possible single point mutation is estimated to appear in a virus particle more than 1000 times per day in each infected person. Many multiple mutations also occur. Most of these mutations either have no effect or are detrimental to the virus. However, a few of the mutant virus particles encode proteases that are less susceptible to inhibition by the drug. In the presence of an HIV protease inhibitor, these virus particles will tend to replicate more effectively than does the population at large. With the passage of time, the less-susceptible viruses will come to dominate the population and the virus population will become resistant to the drug.

Pathogens may become resistant to antibiotics by completely different mechanisms. Some pathogens contain enzymes that inactivate or degrade specific antibiotics. For example, many bacteria are resistant to β-lactams such as penicillin because they contain β-lactamase enzymes. These enzymes hydrolyze the β-lactam ring and render the drugs inactive.

Many of these enzymes are encoded in plasmids, small circular pieces of DNA often carried by bacteria. Many plasmids are readily transferred from one bacterial cell to another, transmitting the capability for antibiotic resistance. Plasmid transfer thus contributes to the spread of antibiotic resistance, a major health-care challenge. On the other hand, plasmids have been harnessed for use in recombinant DNA methods (Section 5.2).

Drug resistance commonly emerges in the course of cancer treatment. Cancer cells are characterized by their ability to grow rapidly without the constraints that apply to normal cells. Many drugs used for cancer chemotherapy inhibit processes that are necessary for this rapid cell growth. However, individual cancer cells may accumulate genetic changes that mitigate the effects of such drugs. These altered cancer cells will tend to grow more rapidly than others and will become dominant within the cancer-cell population. This ability of cancer cells to mutate quickly has been a challenge to one of the major breakthroughs in cancer treatment: the development of inhibitors for proteins specific to cancer cells present in certain leukemias (Section 14.5). For example, tumors become undetectable in patients treated with imatinib mesylate, which is directed against the Bcr-Abl protein kinase. Unfortunately, the tumors of many of the patients treated with imatinib mesylate recur after a period of years. In many of these cases, mutations have altered the Bcr-Abl protein so that it is no longer inhibited by the concentrations of imatinib mesylate used in therapy.

1054

Cancer patients often take multiple drugs concurrently in the course of chemotherapy and, in many cases, cancer cells become simultaneously resistant to many or all of them. This multiple-drug resistance can be due to the proliferation of cancer cells that overexpress a number of ABC transporter proteins that pump drugs out of the cell (Section 13.2). Thus, cancer cells can evolve drug resistance by over expressing normal human proteins or by modifying proteins responsible for the cancer phenotype.