Analyzing Concept Explanations

121

As you read the selections in this chapter, you will see how different authors explain concepts:

Analyzing how these writers develop a surprising or interesting focus for their explanation, how they organize the explanation to draw readers in and keep them reading, how they use examples and other writing strategies to make the topic compelling, and how they integrate sources to make their claims convincing will help you see how you can employ these same techniques to make your own concept explanations successful.

Determine the writer’s purpose and audience.

How well a writer analyzes and explains a concept can demonstrate how well he or she understands it. That is why this kind of writing is so frequently assigned in college courses. But it is also a popular genre outside of the classroom, where effective writers manage to make the most esoteric topics interesting and important. These authors understand that a concept explanation risks being dry and uninteresting to those not already intrigued by the topic, so they make an effort to zero in on a focus that will excite the curiosity of their readers. When reading the concept explanations that follow, ask yourself questions like these:

What seems to be the writer’s main purpose?

What does the writer assume about the audience?

image Basic Features

A Focused Explanation

A Clear, Logical Organization

Appropriate Explanatory Strategies

Smooth Integration of Sources

Assess the genre’s basic features.

122

As you read the concept explanations in this chapter, evaluate how effectively different authors employ the genre’s basic features. The examples that follow are drawn from the reading selections that appear later in this Guide to Reading.

A FOCUSED EXPLANATION

Read first to identify the concept. Ask yourself:

A CLEAR, LOGICAL ORGANIZATION

Consider whether the concept explanation is clearly and logically organized. Notice how each writer develops a plan that does the following:

APPROPRIATE EXPLANATORY STRATEGIES

Look for explanatory strategies, such as definition, classification, comparison-contrast, example, illustration, and cause-effect, that help readers understand the topic:

Defining characteristic

Term being defined

Terms being contrasted

Cues

Cue

Cues

Examples

Reference to a visual in the text

Effect

Cause

DEFINITION Each person carries in his or her mind a unique subliminal guide to the ideal partner, a “love map,” . . . (Toufexis, par. 17)
COMPARISON-CONTRAST Shyness and introversion are not the same thing. Shy people fear negative judgment; introverts simply prefer quiet, minimally stimulating environments. . . . (Cain, par. 9)

In contrast,. . . (Cain, par. 19)

EXAMPLE Despite . . . side effectsnausea, loss of sex drive, seizures drugs like Zoloft . . . (Cain, par. 3)

We find them in recent history, in figures like Charles Darwin, Marcel Proust and Albert Einstein, and, in contemporary times: think of Google’s Larry Page, or Harry Potter’s creator, J. K. Rowling. (Cain, par. 11)

ILLUSTRATION (WITH VISUAL) Like hurricanes, the power of volcanoes is measured using an exponential scale (see the Volcanic Explosivity Index, or VEI, in Fig. 1). (Potthast, par. 1)
CAUSE-EFFECT To a fatigued judge, denying parole seems like the easier call not only because it preserves the status quo. . . but also because it leaves more options open. . . . (Tierney, par. 11)

(For more on writing strategies such as definition and classification, see Chapters 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19.)

SMOOTH INTEGRATION OF SOURCES

Notice how writers draw on research, as well as their own experiences and observations, to explain the concept. How do writers establish their authority by smoothly integrating information from sources into the explanation? Does the writer quote, paraphrase, or summarize the source material? How does the writer establish the source’s expertise and credibility? The examples below demonstrate some strategies:

Signal phrase plus credentials

Parenthetical citation

QUOTE According to Joel Achenbach, a reporter on science and politics for the Washington Post,. . . a super-eruption 2.1 million years ago . . . “[left] a hole in the ground the size of Rhode Island” (1). (Potthast, par. 9)

In the wake of the . . . eruption, a pyroclastic flow “swept down the mountain, flattening forests, overtaking escaping vehicles and killing several people who stood absolutely no chance of moving out of its path” (“Lahars”). (Potthast, par. 2)

PARAPHRASE It is the difference between passionate and compassionate love, observes Walsh, a psychobiologist at Boise State University in Idaho. (Toufexis, par. 14)
SUMMARY Decision fatigue is the newest discovery involving . . . ego depletion, a term coined by the social psychologist Roy F. Baumeister. . . [who] began studying mental discipline in a series of experiments . . . [that] demonstrated that there is a finite store of mental energy for exerting self-control. (Tierney, par. 6)

124

How writers treat sources depends on the writing situation. Certain formal situations, such as college assignments or scholarly publications, require writers to cite sources in the text and document them in a bibliography (called a list of works cited in many humanities disciplines and a list of references in the sciences and social sciences). Students and scholars are expected to cite their sources formally because readers judge their work in part by what the writers have read and how they have used their reading. They may also be interested in locating the sources and reading more about the topic for themselves. (Jonathan Potthast’s essay provides an example of academic citation.) For writing in popular sources, like magazine and newspaper articles for example, readers do not expect references or publication information to appear in the article, but they do expect sources to be identified and their expertise established in some way. (The articles by Toufexis, Tierney, and Cain provide examples of informal citation.)