15.9 Stokes' Theorem

OBJECTIVES

When you finish this section, you should be able to:

  1. Find the curl of \(\mathbf{F}\) (p. 1046)
  2. Verify Stokes' Theorem (p. 1047)
  3. Use Stokes' Theorem to find an integral (p. 1048)
  4. Use Stokes' Theorem with conservative vector fields (p. 1049)
  5. Interpret the curl of \(\mathbf{F}\) (p. 1050)

ORIGINS

Stokes' Theorem is named after the Irish mathematician George Gabriel Stokes (1819–1903). Stokes, along with Maxwell and Kelvin, contributed to the prominence of the Cambridge School of Mathematical Physics.

Stokes' Theorem is a second generalization of Green's Theorem to space. Stokes' Theorem expresses a certain relationship between a line integral of a vector field \(\mathbf{F}\) around a simple closed curve \(C\) in space to a surface integral for which \(C\) forms the boundary. The theorem is used in applications of electricity and magnetism, most notably in Ampere's Law and in the Maxwell–Faraday Law.

1046

To get started, we need the definition of the curl of \(\mathbf{F}\).

spanDEFINITIONspan Curl of \(\mathbf{F}\)

Let \(\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{F}(x,y,z)=P(x,y,z)\mathbf{i}+Q(x,y,z)\mathbf{j }+R(x,y,z)\mathbf{k}\) be a vector field, where the functions \(P\), \(Q\), and \(R\) have first-order partial derivatives. The \(\mathbf{curl}\, \mathbf{of}\, \mathbf{F}\), denoted by curl \(\mathbf{F}\), is defined as* \[ {\bbox[5px, border:1px solid black, #F9F7ED]{\bbox[#FAF8ED,5pt]{ \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}=\left( \dfrac{\partial R}{\partial y}- \dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial z}\right) \mathbf{i}-\left( \dfrac{\partial R}{ \partial x}-\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial z}\right) \,\mathbf{j}+\left( \dfrac{ \partial Q}{\partial x}-\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial y}\right) \mathbf{k}}}} \]

*Some books define \(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\) as the cross product \({\bf {\nabla}}\times \mathbf{F},\) where \({\bf \nabla }\) is the partial differential operator \({\bf\nabla }= \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x}\mathbf{i}+\dfrac{\partial }{\partial y}\mathbf{ j}+\dfrac{\partial }{\partial z}\mathbf{k}\) and \(\mathbf{F}=P\mathbf{i}+Q\mathbf{j}+R\mathbf{k}\).

Rather than memorize this definition, you can write the curl in the form of the symbolic determinant: \[ {\bbox[5px, border:1px solid black, #F9F7ED]{\bbox[#FAF8ED,5pt]{ \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}=\left\vert \begin{array}{c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\[3pt] \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial z} \\[7pt] P & Q & R \end{array} \right\vert }}} \]

1 Find the Curl of F

Finding the Curl of \(\mathbf{F}\)

Find curl \(\mathbf{F}\) if \(\mathbf{F}=x^{2}y\mathbf{i}-2xz\,\mathbf{j} +2yz\,\mathbf{k}\).

Solution  \[ \begin{eqnarray*} {\rm curl}\,\mathbf{F}& =&\left\vert \begin{array}{@{}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k}\\ \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y} & \dfrac{ \partial }{\partial z}\\ x^{2}y & -2xz & 2yz \end{array} \right\vert \\ & =&\left[ \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y}(2yz)-\dfrac{\partial }{\partial z} (-2xz)\right] \,\mathbf{i}-\left[ \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x}(2yz)-\dfrac{ \partial }{\partial z}(x^{2}y)\right] \,\mathbf{j}+\left[ \dfrac{\partial }{ \partial x}(-2xz)-\dfrac{\partial }{\partial y}(x^{2}y)\right] \mathbf{k} \\ & =&(2z+2x)\,\mathbf{i}-(0-0)\,\mathbf{j}+(-2z-x^{2})\mathbf{k}=(2z+2x)\, \mathbf{i}+(-2z-x^{2})\,\mathbf{k} \end{eqnarray*} \]

NOW WORK

Problem 11.

Stokes' Theorem can be stated in vector form as \[ {\bbox[5px, border:1px solid black, #F9F7ED]{\bbox[#FAF8ED,5pt]{ \oint\limits_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS} {\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\, dS}}} \tag{1} \]

under certain conditions on the surface \(S\) and the curve \(C\).

The conditions require the surface \(S\) to be:

1047

Figure 71

THEOREM Stokes' Theorem

Let \(S\) be a smooth, simply connected, orientable surface bounded by a piecewise-smooth, simple closed curve \(C\). Let \(\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{F} (x,y,z)=P(x,y,z)\mathbf{i}+Q(x,y,z)\mathbf{j}+R(x,y,z)\mathbf{k}\) be a vector field, where \(P\), \(Q\), and \(R\) have continuous first-order partial derivatives throughout a solid \(E\) containing \(S\) and \(C\). Let \(\mathbf{n}\) denote the positive unit normal to \(S\), and let \(C\) be positively oriented, as described earlier. Then \[ {\bbox[#FAF8ED,5pt]{\bbox[5px, border:1px solid black, #F9F7ED]{ \oint_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS} {\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS}}} \]

In terms of the components of each vector, Stokes' Theorem takes the form \[ {\bbox[5px, border:1px solid black, #F9F7ED]{\bbox[#FAF8ED,5pt]{ \oint\limits_{C}(P\,dx+Q\,dy+R\,dz)=\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}\left[ \left( \dfrac{ \partial R}{\partial y}-\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial z}\right) dy\,dz-\left( \dfrac{\partial R}{\partial x}-\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial z} \right) \,dz\,dx+\left( \dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial x}-\dfrac{\partial P}{ \partial y}\right) dx\,dy\right]}}} \]

The proof of Stokes' Theorem is given in advanced calculus books.

2 Verify Stokes' Theorem

Verifying Stokes' Theorem

Verify Stokes' Theorem for \(\mathbf{F}=y\mathbf{i}-x\mathbf{j}\), where the surface \(S\) is the paraboloid \(z=x^{2}+y^{2}\), with \(x^{2}+y^{2}=1\), \(z=1 \), as its boundary \(C\).

Figure 72 \(C: x^{2} + y^{2} = 1; z =1\)

SolutionFigure 72 shows the paraboloid and the circle \(C\) in the plane \(z=1\). Stokes' Theorem states the following: \[ \oint\limits_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F} \,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS \]

Parametric equations for \(C\) are \(x=\cos t\), \(y=\sin t\), \(z=1,\) \( 0\leq t\leq 2\pi\). We use the parametric equations to find the line integral \(\oint_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}\) for \(\mathbf{F}=y\mathbf{i}-x \mathbf{j}\). \[ \begin{eqnarray*} \oint_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}&=&\oint_{C}(y\,dx-x\,dy)=\int_{0}^{2\pi } \left[ \sin t\left( -\sin t\,dt\right) -\cos t\cos t\,dt\right]\\[4pt] &=&-\int_{0}^{2\pi }[\sin ^{2}t+\cos ^{2}t]\,dt=-\int_{0}^{2\pi }dt=-2\pi \end{eqnarray*} \]

To find the surface integral, \(\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS\), we find \(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\) and \(\mathbf{n}\): \[ \begin{eqnarray*} \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F} &\mathbf{=}&\left\vert \begin{array}{@{}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\[3pt] \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial z} \\[5pt] P & Q & R \end{array} \right\vert =\left\vert \begin{array}{@{}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\[3pt] \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial z} \\[5pt] y & -x & 0 \end{array} \right\vert \\[4pt] &=&\left[ \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y}0-\dfrac{\partial }{\partial z}(-x) \right] \,\mathbf{i}-\left[ \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x}0-\dfrac{\partial }{ \partial z}y\right] \,\mathbf{j}+\left[ \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x}(-x)- \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y}y\right] \mathbf{k}\\[4pt] &=&0\mathbf{i}-0\mathbf{j}-2\mathbf{k}=-2\mathbf{k} \end{eqnarray*} \]

1048

For \(z=f(x,y) =x^{2}+y^{2}\), we have \[ \begin{eqnarray*} \mathbf{n\,} &=& \tfrac{-f_{x}(x,y)\mathbf{i}-f_{y}(x,y) \mathbf{j\,}+\,\mathbf{k}}{\sqrt{[f_{x}(x,y)]^{2}+[f_{y}(x,y)]^{2}+1}} = \dfrac{-2x\mathbf{i}-2y\mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k}}{\sqrt{ 4x^{2}+4y^{2}+1}}\\[4pt] \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n} &=&-2\mathbf{k\,{\bf\cdot}\, }\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{ 4x^{2}+4y^{2}+1}}\left( -2x\mathbf{i}-2y\mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k}\right) =\dfrac{ -2}{\sqrt{4x^{2}+4y^{2}+1}} \end{eqnarray*} \] So,

where \(D\) is the interior of the circle \(x^{2}+y^{2}=1\).

NOW WORK

Problem 19.

3 Use Stokes' Theorem to Find an Integral

Using Stokes' Theorem to Find a Surface Integral

Find the surface integral \(\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}{\rm{curl} \, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS\), where \(\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{F}(x,y,z)=y \mathbf{i}+x\mathbf{j}+z\mathbf{k}\) and \(S\) is the surface \( z=5-(x^{2}+y^{2}),\) \(z\geq 1\), using Stokes' Theorem.

Figure 73

SolutionFigure 73 shows the surface \(S\). The boundary curve \(C\) is the circle \(x^{2}+y^{2}=4\) that lies in the plane \(z=1\). The vector form of \(C\) is \(\mathbf{r}=\mathbf{r}(t)=2\cos t\,\mathbf{i}+2\sin t\,\mathbf{j}+ \mathbf{k}\), \(0\leq t\leq 2\pi \). Then \[ \begin{eqnarray*} d\mathbf{r}& =&(-2\,\sin t\,\mathbf{i}+2\,\cos t\,\mathbf{j})\,dt \\[4pt] \mathbf{F}& =&y\mathbf{i}+x\mathbf{j}+z\mathbf{k}=2\,\sin t\mathbf{i}+2\,\cos t \mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k} \\[4pt] \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}& =&(-4\,\sin ^{2}t+4\,\cos ^{2}t)\,dt=4\,\cos (2t) \,dt \end{eqnarray*} \]

Now we use Stokes' Theorem. \[ \iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS=\oint_{C}\mathbf{F} \,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=\int_{0}^{2\pi }4\,\cos (2t) \,dt= 2 \big[ \sin(2t)\big] _{0}^{2\pi }=0 \]

NOW WORK

Problem 25.

In Example 3, we found the surface integral \(\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}\,dS\) using the line integral of \(\mathbf{F}\) on the boundary \(C\) of the surface \(S\). This means that for any surface \(S_{1}\) with the same orientation and the same boundary curve as \(S\), the surface integral \(\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS_{1}}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS_{1}\) will have the same value as \(\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS\).

We can use Stokes' Theorem to find a line integral, and avoid having to find a surface integral. However, it is more frequently used in the opposite direction. In cases where it is not easy to find the line integral \( \oint_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}\), but the quantity curl \(\mathbf{F} \,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}\) is simple in form on an open surface with boundary \(C\), then it can be easier to find \(\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS\).

1049

Using Stokes' Theorem to Find a Line Integral

Find \(I=\oint_{C}[(e^{-x^{2}/2}-yz)\,dx+(e^{-y^{2}/2}+xz+2x) \,dy+(e^{-z^{2}/2}+5)\,dz]\), where \(C\) is the circle \(x=\cos t\), \(y=\sin t\), \(z=2\), \(0\leq t\leq 2\pi \).

Solution  Let \(\mathbf{F}=P\,\mathbf{i}+Q\,\mathbf{j}+R\,\mathbf{k} \), with \(P=e^{-x^{2}/2}-yz\), \(\ Q=e^{-y^{2}/2}+xz+2x\), and \( R=e^{-z^{2}/2}+5\). It can be verified that \[ {\rm{curl }}\,{\bf{F}} = - x{\bf{i}} - y{\bf{j}}{\rm{ + (2 + 2}}z){\bf{k}} \]

To use Stokes' Theorem, take \(S\) to be a plane region enclosed by the circle \(C\) in the plane \(z\rm{=2}\) so that \(\mathbf{n}=\mathbf{k}\). Then \(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}=6\) on \(S\), and \[ I=\iint\limits_{\kern-3pt S}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS=6\iint \limits_{\kern-3pt S}\,dx\,dy=6\,\pi \]

NOW WORK

Problem 27.

4 Apply Stokes' Theorem to Conservative Vector Fields

A vector field \(\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{F}(x,y,z)=P(x,y,z)\mathbf{i}+Q(x,y,z) \mathbf{j}+R(x,y,z)\mathbf{k}\) is conservative if \(\mathbf{F}\) is the gradient of some function \(\omega =f(x,y,z)\). An extension of earlier proofs shows that \(\mathbf{F}\) is a conservative vector field if and only if \(\int_{C} \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}\) is independent of the path, where \(C\) is a piecewise-smooth curve in space and \(\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{F}(x,y,z)\) is defined on some open, connected solid in space. In particular, if \(C\) is simple and closed, then \(\mathbf{F}\) is a conservative vector field if and only if \(\oint_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=0\) for every piecewise-smooth, simple closed curve \(C\).

Stokes' Theorem provides an easy way to determine whether a vector field \( \mathbf{F}\) in space is a conservative vector field.

THEOREM Conservative Vector Fields in Space

Let \(\mathbf{F}=P(x,y,z)\,\mathbf{i}+Q(x,y,z)\,\mathbf{j}+R(x,y,z)\, \mathbf{k}\) be a vector field whose components \(P\), \(Q\), and \(R\) have continuous first-order partial derivatives throughout a solid \(E\) whose boundary is a surface \(S\) satisfying the conditions of Stokes' Theorem. Then \(\mathbf{F}\) is a conservative vector field if and only if \(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}=\mathbf{0}\) throughout \(S\).

Partial Proof

We provide only an outline of the proof. Suppose \(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}= \mathbf{0}\). Then, by Stokes' Theorem, \[ \begin{equation*} \oint_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F} \,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS=0 \end{equation*} \]

for any closed curve \(C\). That is, \(\mathbf{F}\) is a conservative vector field.

Conversely, suppose \(\mathbf{F}\) is conservative. Then \({\mathbf{F} = \bf\nabla} f\) for some function \(f\). Since \(\mathbf{F}= \mathbf{F}(x,y,z)= P(x,y,z)\mathbf{i} + Q(x,y,z)\,\mathbf{j}+R(x,y,z)\,\mathbf{k},\) and \({\bf\nabla}f(x,y,z) = \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x} f(x,y,z)\mathbf{i} + \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y} f(x,y,z)\mathbf{j} + \dfrac{\partial }{\partial z}(x,y,z)\mathbf{k}\), then \[ \begin{eqnarray*} \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F} &\mathbf{=}&\left\vert \begin{array}{@{}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\[3pt] \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial z} \\[7pt] P & Q & R \end{array} \right\vert =\left\vert \begin{array}{@{}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\[3pt] \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial z} \\[5pt] \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x}f(x,y,z) & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y}f(x,y,z) & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial z}f(x,y,z) \end{array} \right\vert \\[6pt] &=& \left(\dfrac{\partial^{2}f }{\partial{y} \partial{z}} - \dfrac{\partial^{2}f }{\partial{z} \partial{y}}\right)\,\mathbf{i} - \left(\dfrac{\partial^{2}f }{\partial{x} \partial{z}} - \dfrac{\partial^{2}f }{\partial{z} \partial{x}}\right)\,\mathbf{j} + \left(\dfrac{\partial^{2}f }{\partial{x} \partial{y}} - \dfrac{\partial^{2}f }{\partial{y} \partial{x}}\right)\mathbf{k}\\[6pt] &=&0\mathbf{i}+0\mathbf{j}+0\mathbf{k}= \mathbf{0} \end{eqnarray*} \]

NEED TO REVIEW?

The Equality of Mixed Partials Theorem is discussed in Section 12.3, p. 835.

The following statements are similar to those listed in the Summary at the end of Section 15.3 for a vector field in the plane.

1050

Summary

Suppose \(\mathbf{F}=P(x,y,z)\,\mathbf{i}+Q(x,y,z)\,\mathbf{j}+R(x,y,z)\, \mathbf{k}\) is a vector field whose components \(P\), \(Q\), and \(R\) have continuous first-order partial derivatives throughout a solid \(E\) whose boundary is a smooth, simply connected, oriented surface \(S\) bounded by a piecewise-smooth, simple closed curve \(C\). Then the following are equivalent statements for a vector field \(\mathbf{F}=P\mathbf{i}+Q\mathbf{j}+R\mathbf{k} \) in space:

Of all these equivalent statements, the easiest to establish is \(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F=0}\).

Showing That \(\mathbf{F}\) Is a Conservative Vector Field

Show that \(\mathbf{F}=\left( \dfrac{3}{5}y^{5}+2z^{2}\right) \mathbf{i} +3xy^{4}\,\mathbf{j}+4xz\,\mathbf{k}\) is a conservative vector field in space.

Solution  We find \(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\). \[ \begin{equation*} \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}=\left\vert \begin{array}{@{}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\[5pt] \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y} & \dfrac{ \partial }{\partial z} \\[5pt] \dfrac{3}{5}y^{5}+2z^{2} & 3xy^{4} & 4xz \end{array} \right\vert =(0-0)\,\mathbf{i}-(4z-4z)\,\mathbf{j}+(3y^{4}-3y^{4})\mathbf{k}= \mathbf{0} \end{equation*} \]

Since \(\rm{curl}\,\mathbf{F=0}\), \(\mathbf{F}\) is conservative.

NOW WORK

Problem 31.

5 Interpret the Curl of F

Stokes' Theorem provides an interpretation for the curl of a vector.

Suppose \(Q=(x_{1},y_{1},z_{1})\) is the center of a circular disk \(S_{\rho }\) of radius \(\rho\) and \(C_{\rho }\) is the boundary of \(S_{\rho }\), as shown in Figure 74. There is a Mean Value Theorem for double integrals that, when combined with Stokes' Theorem, gives us \[ {\bbox[5px, border:1px solid black, #F9F7ED]{\bbox[#FAF8ED,5pt]{ \oint\limits_{C_{\rho }}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS_{ \rho }}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS=\left(\rm{curl}\,\mathbf{ F\,{\bf\cdot}\, n}\right) _{Q^{\ast }}( \pi \rho ^{2})}}} \]

Figure 74

where \(\left( \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}\right) _{Q^{\ast }}\) is the value of \(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}\) evaluated at a suitably chosen point \(Q^{\ast }=(x^{\ast },y^{\ast },z^{\ast })\) in \( S_{\rho }\), and where \(\pi \rho ^{2}\) is the area of \(S_{\rho }\). Then \[ \begin{equation*} (\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n})_{Q^{\ast }}=\dfrac{1}{\pi \rho ^{2}} \oint_{C_{\rho }}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r} \end{equation*} \]

Now, if \(\rho\) is allowed to approach \(0\), then \(Q^{\ast }\rightarrow Q\), and \[ \begin{equation} (\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n})_{Q}=\lim\limits_{\rho \rightarrow 0}\dfrac{1 }{\pi \rho ^{2}}\oint_{C_{\rho }}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r} \tag{2} \end{equation} \]

In the case where \(\mathbf{F}\) is the velocity of a fluid, the integral \( \oint_{C_{\rho }}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}\) in (2) is referred to as the circulation, or whirling tendency of the fluid around \( C_{\rho}\). It measures the extent to which the fluid rotates around the circle \(C_{\rho }\) in the direction of the orientation of \(C_{\rho }\). Equation (2) therefore states that the component of \(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\) at \((x_{1},y_{1},z_{1})\) in the direction of \(\mathbf{n}\) is the limiting ratio of circulation to area for a circle about \((x_{1},y_{1},z_{1})\) with \( \mathbf{n}\) as a normal, or \[ {\bbox[5px, border:1px solid black, #F9F7ED]{\bbox[#FAF8ED,5pt]{ \hbox{Circulation per unit of area at } ( x_{1},y_{1},z_{1}) =(\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n})_{Q} }}} \]

The expression \((\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n})_{Q}\) is a maximum at \(Q\) when \(\mathbf{n}\) has the same direction as curl \(\mathbf{F}\).

1051

Figure 75

Suppose that a small paddle wheel of radius \(\rho \) is introduced into the fluid at \(Q\) with its axle directed along \(\mathbf{n}\). The rate of spin of the paddle wheel is affected by the circulation of the fluid around \(C_{\rho }\). The wheel will spin fastest when the circulation integral is maximized; that is, it will spin fastest when the axle of the paddle wheel is in the direction of \(\rm{curl}\,\mathbf{F}\). See Figure 75.

Another interpretation of the curl is based on motion.

THEOREM Curl and Angular Velocity

Let \(\mathbf{F}\) be the velocity field of a fluid rotating about a fixed axis and let \({\bf\omega }\) be the constant angular velocity. Then \[ {\bbox[5px, border:1px solid black, #F9F7ED]{\bbox[#FAF8ED,5pt]{ \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}=2 \bf\omega }}} \]

NEED TO REVIEW?

Angular velocity is discussed in Section 10.5, pp. 729-730.

Proof

Since the motion of a fluid is simply a rotation about a given fixed axis in space, the angular velocity \({\bf\omega }\) can be represented by a constant vector: \[ {\bf\omega }=\omega _{1}\mathbf{i}+\omega _{2}\mathbf{j}+\omega _{3}\mathbf{k} \]

where the magnitude of \({\bf\omega }\) is the angular speed and the direction of \({\bf\omega }\) is along the direction of the axis of rotation, in accordance with the right-hand rule. If the origin of a rectangular coordinate system is on the fixed axis and \(\mathbf{r}=x\mathbf{i }+y\mathbf{j}+z\mathbf{k}\), then the velocity vector \(\mathbf{F}\) is \[ \mathbf{F}={\bf\omega} \times \mathbf{r} \] and \[ \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}=\left\vert \begin{array}{@{}c@{\quad}c@{\quad}c} \mathbf{i} & \mathbf{j} & \mathbf{k} \\[3pt] \dfrac{\partial }{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial }{\partial z} \\[3pt] \omega _{2}z-\omega _{3}y & \omega _{3}x-\omega _{1}z & \omega _{1}y-\omega _{2}x \end{array} \right\vert \]

Since \({\bf\omega }\) is constant, then \[ \rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}=2\omega _{1}\mathbf{i}+2\omega _{2}\mathbf{j}+2\omega _{3}\mathbf{k}=2 {\bf\omega } \]

IN WORDS

If a fluid is rotating, the curl of the velocity vector is a constant vector that equals twice the angular velocity vector.

Summary

We opened the chapter by stating that “vector calculus is the culmination of what we have learned throughout the course.” Now we end the chapter with a list of several of the formulas we have learned. The theorem formulas given below do not contain the important hypotheses necessary for the formulas to hold. Rather, this summary is meant to “pull everything together” and provide “the big picture of calculus.”

Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals

If \({{\bf}{\nabla}} \,f(x,\,y) = {\bf{F}}(x,\,y)\), then \[ \int_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=\int_{C} {\bf\nabla}\ f\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=\int_{(x_{0},y_{0}) }^{(x_{1},y_{1}) }{\bf\nabla}\ f\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=f(x_{1},y_{1}) -f(x_{0},y_{0}) \]

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

If \(F' (x) =f(x) ,\) then \[ \int_{a}^{b}f(x) dx=\int_{a}^{b}F' (x) dx=F( b) -F( a) \]

Green's Theorem

If \(\mathbf{F}(x,y) =P(x,y) \,\mathbf{i}+Q(x,y) \,\mathbf{j},\) then \[ \oint_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r} =\oint_{C}(P\,dx+Q\,dy)=\iint\limits_{\kern-3ptR}\left( \dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial x} -\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial y}\right) \,dx\,dy \]

1052

Divergence Theorem

If \(\mathbf{F}(x,y,z)=P(x,y,z)\mathbf{i}+Q(x,y,z)\mathbf{j}+R(x,y,z)\mathbf{k},\) and \(\mathbf{n}=\cos \alpha \mathbf{i}+\cos \beta \mathbf{j}+\cos \gamma \mathbf{k}\), then \[ \begin{eqnarray*} &&\iiint\limits_{E}{\rm div}\,\mathbf{F}\,dV = \iint\limits_{\kern-3ptS}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, {\mathbf{n}}\,dS \\ &&\iiint\limits_{E}\left( \dfrac{\partial P}{\partial x}+ \dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial y}+\dfrac{\partial R}{\partial z} \right) dV\\[4pt] &&\hspace{7pc}=\iint\limits_{S}(P\cos \alpha +Q\cos \beta +R\cos \gamma )\,dS \end{eqnarray*} \]

Stokes' Theorem

If \(\mathbf{F}(x,y,z)=P(x,y,z)\mathbf{i}+Q(x,y,z)\mathbf{j}+R(x,y,z)\mathbf{k},\) then \[ \begin{eqnarray*} &&\oint_{C}\mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, d\mathbf{r}=\iint\limits_{S}{\rm{curl}\, \mathbf{F}\,{\bf\cdot}\, \mathbf{n}}\,dS \\ &&\hspace{.5pc}\oint_{C}(P\,dx+Q\,dy+R\,dz)=\iint\limits_{S}\left[ \left( \dfrac{\partial R}{\partial y}-\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial z}\right) dy\,dz\right.\hspace{-2.6pc}\\ &&\qquad-\left.\left( \dfrac{\partial R}{\partial x}-\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial z} \right) dz\,dx+\left( \dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial x}-\dfrac{\partial P}{ \partial y}\right) dx\,dy\right] \end{eqnarray*} \]